St. Martin News Network

Saturday
May 25th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Sint Maarten Cruise Slippage as Cayman Islands Plans Two Cruise Piers.

Email Print
User Rating:  / 0

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Dr. A.C. Wathey Cruise & Cargo Facility informed Parliament back in February that the country could not afford to take its cruise product for granted and that we need to be innovative and redevelop the product.

Members of Parliament (MPs) were told that there were competition and threats facing the country's cruise infrastructure and we needed to be on the ball where this is concerned. MPs were informed that the extension of Pier Two had to do in large part with cruise developments on neighbouring islands. The extension of the aforementioned pier would create flexibility and less stress when it came to itinerary bookings. The extension of Pier Two is approximately US$30 million to be financed through strategic agreements with the cruise lines.

Carnival Cruise Lines and Royal Caribbean who both financed Pier Two have preferential berths whereby they guarantee passenger numbers.

The same concept that the Port of Sint Maarten has used to finance the construction of Pier Two will be used by the Cayman Islands.

The Cayman Islands have been working to construct cruise piers since 2003, but to date without success. Today, cruise passengers are transported to shore on board tender boats. The Cayman Islands receive 1.5 million cruise passengers per year.

Carnival brings approximately 900,000 tourists a year to Grand Cayman and Royal Caribbean 250,000, accounting for almost three quarters of cruise passengers. Both cruise lines are expected to be vying to build the two cruise piers that would be able to berth a total of four ships at one time. According to media reports, four cruise lines have expressed interests in building the piers.

Priority berthing rights and a waiver on docking surcharges may be part of the mix for cruise lines to provide the funding to construct the piers. A bidding process is expected to take place in the coming months and would be open not only to cruise lines but to other interested parties as well, however cruise lines are seen to have the advantage since they can guarantee cruise passengers annually.

One media report says that the Port Authority of the Cayman Islands would be in control of the piers. Cruise lines with preferential berthing rights would get the first chance to reserve space at the pier as long as they book 18-months in advance. If the 18-month deadline passes, other cruise lines would have the option to book the space.

Sint Maarten's efforts to continue to secure and maintain its position in the cruise industry must remain a top priority and the CEO and his team are well aware of this and are planning ahead. This alone is very re-assuring to the business community.

Roddy Heyliger

Last Updated ( Sunday, 17 March 2013 23:42 )  
Comments (2)
  • Cruise Business
    avatar

    Cruise lines will go where they can make the most profit. When they own all or part of a port more profits stay with them so it is to their advantage to acquire locations to build ports such as Carnival has done with Mahogany Bay in Roatan or the new location at Puerto Plata, DR. Royal Caribbean has done it in Haiti at Labadee and Falmouth in Jamaica. In these locations they are happy to keep the pa**engers at the port. At other locations they make profits from their markup on excursions. Therefore it is extremely important for competing ports to provide viable excursions that are unique to the location to attractive to the pa**engers. The cruise lines don't make profit from beaches and jewelry stores, they need to sell exciting excursions. As a competing port St Maarten has always been in need of higher volume excursions. We have been out in front with creative ways to facilitate development of the Port thanks to strong leadership in that direction which is why visitation has been good to this point. Market share will be lost to competing ports however if we continue to stagnante and don't offer any new tourism venues.
    Unfortunately, Marlin and Brookson (for their own reasons) saw to it that would not happen with the Emilio Wilson property which seems doomed to become a housing development with no historical preservation rather than a sustainable tourism venue which revitalizes nature while celebrating the EWE story, St Maartens History, Culture and traditions.

  • advantage??
    avatar

    In Dutch language people call this: de wet van de remmende voorsprong. It means that you do not see any reason for investment or progress, because you are number one now, and you think you can lean back. No way! You have to stay focussed and you have to invest in order to maintain your position.

Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Gravatar enabled
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [s] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.