St. Martin News Network

Wednesday
May 22nd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

St. Maarten Takes Measures to Protect Thrill-seekers at West End of Princess Juliana International Airport Runway.

Email Print
User Rating:  / 2
SIMPSON BAY:--- Following recent incidents of thrill-seekers being injured while hanging on to the fence at the west end of Princess Juliana International Airport in St. Maarten, the airport authorities and government officials are increasing security measures.
We have noted with much regret recent media reports and YouTube postings about an incident over the Easter holidays in which two young persons were said to have been blown from the fence at the west end of the Princess Juliana International Airport runway, as a jet aircraft was taking off.
Fortunately the injuries suffered particularly by one young woman involved were reportedly not debilitating.
The airport is currently considering heightened security in that area, in consultation with the St. Maarten government to allow for a stricter implementation and reinforcement of the warnings to the general public posted along the fence.
We will continue to take all necessary measures and precautions to ensure the safety of all users of the airport, including persons visiting St. Maarten, and we urge everyone to adhere to all public safety warnings.
Princess Juliana International Airport has always done everything within its power to enhance the personal safety of all visitors to the destination, and in particular, users and visitors to our airport.
However, incidents such as this unfortunate one emphasize the need for everyone, including all our visitors to heed the clear warnings – about the dangers of jet blast – posted along the airport fence.
We acknowledge the obvious attraction by visitors of planes landing so close to the beach, which has added to making the destination quite popular; nevertheless, no amount of excitement or thrill can justify putting one's life in danger.
Measures currently in place include double fencing, warning signs; and brightly-painted guardrails—all of which have been implemented in consultation with the government to deter dangerous activity.
Last Updated ( Friday, 13 April 2012 04:20 )  
Comments (18)
  • irieness
    avatar

    Good measures, but isn't it cheaper to notify the airliners and their pilots not to join in on the fun? Some pilots of the big jet airliners tend to takeoff in the overrun area of the runway (close to the fence as possible). Same thing happened when the lady got injured, the pilot of the pane positioned the plane as close as possible to the fence, while it was not necessary to take off....

  • Ayle
    avatar

    From the video, she didn't get hurt because the plane was so close. She hurt herself because she decided to let go midway through it, then tripped and fell. Doesn't matter if the plane was in the overrun area or the actual runway, when she let go disaster was pretty much unavoidable.

  • dragon
    avatar

    irieness,it doesn't where the airline takes off from, as long as people continue to put take risks and put their lives in danger things like this will happen. people are just attracted to danger and will only learn after something like that happens no matter how much signs or warning you give them. there are signs there with, if adhered to will prevented the accident but those that still do those silly things just underestimate the power of the jet blast and have only themselves to blame for what happened.

  • The Observer
    avatar

    We buy smart phones and do dumb things. The law implements measures to protect us from from our own selves and yet we won't comply. What else is left to say?

  • JetBlue
    avatar

    A great example of social media destroying what many have enjoyed and I don't mean hanging onto a fence when an aircraft departs. That is plain stupid and should have been discouraged strongly watch from the beach. Why do we need these moron thrill seekers here anyway.

  • PROBLEM SOLVED
    avatar

    Jus install what the US aircraft carriers have, Where the part of the floor comes up just before the plane takes off and stop the jet blast from straight back!

    It redirects the jet blast upwards, It might cost a bit but is the best solution to the problem!

    So u dont have to take a beauty of a plane taking off!

  • Ricardo
    avatar

    Just a curved concrete structure would do, curved upwards like a skateboard ramp, and as wide as the spacing betwwen the outboard engines of a 747, 7ft tall.

    Want a picture of a plane? Stand to one side! Want a thrill? Go ziplining, or something similar. Better for the SXM economy, too.

    Having a 7ft concrete structure in the runway 27 overrun might be a problem too, but far less likely to be.

    Question is, why preserve the lives of idiots? Darwin awards need winners more than the human race needs the idiot gene.

  • Boo-boo
    avatar

    Concrete structures would be a danger to aircraft coming in too low, ala Air France. There are specially designed aluminum siding, made especially for the purpose of deflecting the exhaust upwards and would prevent those idiots from hurting themselves. At the same time should an airplane hit them during a landing, they would brake away and not cause a catastrophe.

  • dragon
    avatar

    observer you give me a good laugh, "buy a smart phone and do dumb things" hahahah. well i't the phone that's smart not the person. lol.

  • Teneriffe77
    avatar

    Concret structures would also be a danger to any aircraft that overruns the runway and could result in many people getting hurt. In my home area there's a notorious rail bridge that gets hit but trucks and bus's once in a while cause the drivers ignore 8 warning signs placed before it. They can't lower cause it's next to a major lake and raising it would be too expensive. My point is people can be idiots and no matter what you do some folks will find a way to get themselves hurt and the rest of use shouldn't have to suffer like losing the ability to see planes pa** right over your head in this case.

  • Finalapproach
    avatar

    I would say that people need to take personal responsibility. That beach is a huge draw for people, but they must accept the risk they take. One cannot expect the authorities to have to protect people from their own stupidity, I say. The signs on the fence are clear about the dangers and any sane person would know that standing behind a jet taking off is not the best place to be, but its not up to the authorities if such idiots if they insist on doing so.

  • irieness
    avatar

    Please read my posts better, I never said it was the pilots fault. I just stated they can be the source of easy "measure".

    Of course it's the lady fault, but you can't just expect people to listen, even if there are laws, security guards and "deterrent" measures in place. It's human nature to do dumb things, no matter how many "measures" you take. This jet-blast riding thing is just too irresistible for thrill seekers.

    So hypothetically, if people adhered to the signs these things wont happen, but realistically speaking, people will continue doing this and I bet only drastic/expensive measures will have to be taken when someone dies because they hit their head on the concrete divider.

    That's why I said a simple solution would be for pilots not to join in on the fun, even if it's not their duty. Why do we have to babysit tourists now???

  • irieness
    avatar

    @ Ayle.

    Distance do matter. There is a whole science behind airport planning that takes account the velocity of the aircraft exhaust in relation to the distance the exhaust travels. I would not be surprised if the pilot had the plane positioned at the right spot the velocity hitting the woman would half the speed.

    Still, it's her fault...

    See chapter 6.1.3 for evidence
    http://www.airbus.com/fileadmin/media_gallery/files/tech_data/AC/AC_A300F4- 600_20091201.pdf

  • www.sxmmelee.com
    avatar

    there is a warning sign. we are adults, personal responsibility

  • Michael C.
    avatar

    Meh, why argue over this? Just let natural selection take care of dumb ppl instead of make infinite laws protecting them from their own stupidity. It's not like they are productive members of society anyways.

  • Gene D
    avatar

    She wouldn't have been hurt at all if the idiot didn't let go of the fence.

  • John G
    avatar

    As with anything else that's good in life all it takes is one idiot to wreck it for everyone else. This is a very popular spot for plane spotters the world over. No where can you get this kind of exposure to aircraft operations.

    The individual stupidity of a couple of people a year shouldn't be the determining factor in restricting access in this location. As soon as this video went viral I knew what the response was going to be. Oh, we have to fix this......

    If this had happened in the US the lawsuits would have already been filed. Sad..............

  • yep
    avatar

    Hey " Problem Solved ", need more informed comments like yours . It sure help in this forum.

Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Gravatar enabled
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [s] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.