Mother speaks out: Armed carjacker knew her six-year-old daughter was inside when he drove away.

~Mother says gun discharged during desperate struggle; stolen vehicle later recovered in Agrément.~

cartheft12092026MARIGOT:--- The mother at the center of Thursday’s terrifying armed carjacking in Marigot is speaking out to correct earlier information suggesting that the assailant drove away without realizing her six-year-old daughter was inside the vehicle.

According to the mother, who requested that her identity be withheld, the armed man knew that the child was inside. She said she repeatedly told him about her daughter, but he continued with the attack and ultimately drove away with the child still in the vehicle.

“The man knew my daughter was inside the car,” the mother told SMN News. “I told him repeatedly that my child was in the vehicle. I kept telling him, and he still continued.”

The mother, who works in Concordia, said the incident occurred at about 5:20 p.m. in front of her workplace on Thursday, September 10, as she was leaving work and preparing to go home with her daughter.

She said the assailant opened the door of her grey Hyundai Tucson while armed and demanded that she get out of the vehicle and hand over her keys and mobile phone.

The mother refused to leave because her daughter was already seated inside.

“I told him my daughter was in the car and that I would not get out without my child,” she explained. “He did not want to hear that.”

Gun Discharged During Struggle

According to the mother, the confrontation escalated when the assailant pointed the firearm toward her abdomen. She reacted instinctively and grabbed his hand and the weapon.

During the struggle, the gun was discharged.

“The gun went off while I was fighting for my child,” she said. “Had I not reacted and grabbed it, I do not know what the outcome would have been.”

The mother said there is a bullet mark on the ground at the scene of the attack. She initially believed the grey firearm might have been a toy, but the discharge made it clear that the weapon was real.

People reportedly emerged from nearby abandoned houses after hearing her screams. The sudden appearance of witnesses startled the assailant, and both he and the mother fell during the struggle.

The mother said she landed with her back toward the gunman and raised her hands.

“I told him that if he had to shoot me, shoot me in my leg or my butt, but let my child go,” she recalled.

She then heard the firearm click a second time but said it apparently failed to discharge. The assailant then entered the vehicle and drove away with her six-year-old daughter still inside.

Child ordered out of moving nightmare

The mother said the assailant drove only a short distance before ordering the child out of the vehicle.

According to the child’s account to her mother, the assailant was attempting to locate the mother’s mobile phone inside the car. The phone fell behind the driver’s seat, after which the man shouted at the six-year-old to get out.

The child opened the door herself, exited the vehicle, and ran back toward her mother while still wearing her green school uniform.

The mother said she had been screaming for help and pointing toward the fleeing vehicle, but motorists kept driving past.

“My feet went numb. I could not run or move. I fainted in the middle of the road,” she said. “When I got back up, I saw my daughter running toward me.”

Vehicle Tracked and Recovered

The stolen Hyundai Tucson was recovered on Friday in Agrément after the mother used Google’s phone-location service on her computer to track the mobile phone that remained inside the vehicle.

She took a screenshot of the location and sent it to someone she knew within the municipal police. The information was then passed to the authorities, who located the vehicle at the position indicated by the tracking application.

The Gendarmerie asked the mother for the spare key and recovered the vehicle, which was held overnight before being returned to her.

The mother said she does not know whether anyone has been arrested.

Mother rejects claim assailant was unaware of child

SMN News’ earlier report was based on information provided by the Colonel of the Gendarmerie, who said the thief realized after driving several dozen meters that a child was inside and then ordered her out.

The mother, however, strongly disputes any suggestion that the assailant was initially unaware of her daughter’s presence.

She said she repeatedly warned him that her child was inside while she physically resisted his demands and fought to prevent him from taking the vehicle.

“That distinction is extremely important because it changes the seriousness of what actually happened,” she said. “I did not simply watch someone take my vehicle. I fought because my child was inside while an armed man was threatening me.”

The mother stressed that she is not speaking publicly for attention or publicity. She wants residents to understand the growing level of delinquency and insecurity confronting families in Saint-Martin.

She was leaving work in broad daylight and thinking about what she would prepare for her daughter’s dinner when an ordinary journey home became a potentially deadly encounter.

“This is no joke,” she said. “It could happen to anyone in broad daylight.”

The mother said she is now focused on helping her daughter cope with the trauma while trying to remain strong through her faith.

SMN News is publishing her firsthand account to correct the earlier suggestion that the assailant did not know the child was inside the vehicle. The Gendarmerie remains in charge of the investigation.


Dutch defense launches hurricane emergency exercise on St Maarten and Saba.

defense12092026PHILIPSBURG: Dutch Defense forces in the Caribbean will spend the next two weeks testing their ability to respond to a major hurricane during the annual emergency exercise “Calm Horizon,” with operations taking place on Sint Maarten and Saba.

The Commander of the Navy in the Caribbean announced on Saturday, September 12, 2026, that military personnel will train alongside local security and emergency partners as part of preparations for possible hurricane-related disasters.

The exercise is intended to strengthen coordination between Defense and organizations that would have to work together if a powerful hurricane strikes either island.

Several military units and assets are being deployed during Calm Horizon, including the naval vessel HNLMS Pelikaan, FRISC fast boats, Curaçao military personnel (CURMIL), and Aruban military personnel (ARUMIL).

The units will operate on Sint Maarten and Saba on a rotating basis and will carry out different scenarios focused specifically on emergency assistance following the passage of a hurricane.

Military and Local Partners Train Together

A major component of the exercise will be cooperation between the military and local partners.

According to Defense, military personnel will work with government services, relief organizations, and private-sector companies involved in planning and carrying out emergency assistance.

The joint exercises are designed to coordinate procedures before a real emergency occurs, while also giving military personnel greater knowledge of the local environment where they could eventually be deployed.

The objective is to ensure Defense can move quickly if a hurricane strikes.

After a severe storm, military personnel could be called upon to provide emergency assistance, support civilian authorities, and help maintain public safety and order.

For islands such as Sint Maarten and Saba, where hurricanes can cause widespread infrastructure damage and disrupt essential services, preparedness and coordination between civilian and military authorities are critical to disaster response.

Preparing Before the Next Hurricane

Supporting communities affected by natural disasters is one of Defense's principal responsibilities in the Caribbean region.

The annual Calm Horizon exercise therefore aims to maintain operational readiness rather than waiting for an actual disaster to establish working procedures.

“Through exercises like ‘Calm Horizon’, Defense maintains the capabilities and partnerships to provide the best possible support to the islands' residents in the event of an actual crisis,” Defense stated.

The two-week operation will test not only military readiness but also the ability of Defense, local authorities, emergency organizations and other partners to work together under crisis conditions.

With Sint Maarten and Saba located in the Atlantic hurricane belt, the exercise comes during the active 2026 hurricane season and serves as a practical test of how quickly resources could be mobilized should the islands face a serious tropical cyclone.

Integrity begins with showing up.

~Peterson Records 35% Central Committee Attendance as PFP Ranks Last Overall~

raeyhonpeterson12092026PHILIPSBURG:---  The Party for Progress (PFP), which has built much of its political identity around integrity, transparency, accountability and holding public officials to a higher standard, ended the 2025–2026 Parliamentary Year with the lowest combined attendance rate among the seven factions represented in Parliament.

According to the official Parliament of Sint Maarten Annual Report 2025–2026, PFP faction leader MP Raeyhon Peterson attended only 12 of 34 Central Committee sittings. That gave him a 35% attendance rate and a 65% absence rate—the lowest attendance record among all 15 Members of Parliament.

A Question of Standards

The figures are particularly significant because Peterson and the PFP have repeatedly presented themselves as champions of integrity, accountability, transparency and good governance.

Holding ministers and other public officials accountable is an essential part of an MP’s responsibility. However, accountability must also apply inside Parliament, starting with an elected representative’s presence to do the work taxpayers are paying for.

The annual report recorded 40 Public Meeting sittings and 34 Central Committee sittings, creating 74 attendance opportunities for each MP.

Peterson attended 29 Public Meeting sittings and 12 Central Committee sittings—a total of 41 out of 74, or approximately 55.4%.

His PFP colleague, MP Ludmila de Weever, attended 29 Public Meeting sittings and 23 Central Committee sittings, for a total of 52 out of 74, or approximately 70.3%.

Together, the two PFP MPs recorded 93 attendances out of 148 possible Public and Central Committee attendance opportunities. That produced a combined faction attendance rate of approximately 62.8%—the lowest among Parliament’s seven factions.

How the Factions Compared

Calculations based on the official attendance figures produced the following combined faction attendance rates:

  • URSM: approximately 82.4%
  • DP: approximately 80.6%
  • NOW: approximately 79.7%
  • SAM: approximately 75.7%
  • UPP: approximately 70.3%
  • National Alliance: approximately 68.9%
  • PFP: approximately 62.8%

PFP therefore trailed the sixth-ranked National Alliance by approximately 6.1 percentage points and finished nearly 20 percentage points behind URSM, the faction with the highest combined attendance rate.

Fifty Percent Attendance on Integrity Committee

Parliament’s formal attendance table also shows that two Ad Hoc Committee Integrity meetings were held during the parliamentary year.

Peterson attended the first meeting on October 7, 2025, but was absent from the closed-door meeting held on November 7, 2025. His attendance rate on the Integrity Committee itself was therefore 50%.

The annual report also lists several informal Integrity Committee meetings, but these were not included in Parliament’s formal attendance table or percentage calculations.

Attendance figures do not explain why an MP was absent on any particular occasion, and attendance alone cannot measure every aspect of parliamentary performance. They do, however, provide an objective measure of one of the most basic responsibilities attached to elected office: showing up.

For a party that has repeatedly asked the public to judge political leaders according to the standards of integrity and accountability, Parliament’s official figures now leave PFP facing the same standard it has demanded of others.

SMN News independently recalculated the faction percentages using the Public Meeting and Central Committee attendance totals published on pages 68 and 69 of Parliament’s Annual Report 2025–2026. The Integrity Committee figures appear on page 70.

Parliament records 31 fewer meetings as overall activity falls 25%.

parliamentsxm12092026PHILIPSBURG:---  Parliament of Sint Maarten recorded a substantial decline in meeting activity during the 2025–2026 Parliamentary Year, with decreases reported across every major meeting category.

According to the official Parliament of Sint Maarten Annual Report 2025–2026, Parliament recorded 93 meetings across five categories, compared with 124 during the previous parliamentary year.

That represents 31 fewer meetings—a decline of exactly 25%.

The figures cover Public Meetings, Central Committee meetings, permanent and ad hoc committee meetings, Presidium meetings and Faction Leaders meetings. The annual report notes that the 2025–2026 figures have an August 5, 2026 cutoff date.

Committee Meetings Suffer Largest Decline

The most significant reduction occurred at the permanent and ad hoc committee level.

Parliament recorded 65 committee meetings during the 2024–2025 Parliamentary Year. That number fell to 42 in 2025–2026—a reduction of 23 meetings, or approximately 35.4%.

Committee meetings are particularly important because much of Parliament’s detailed oversight and investigative work occurs at that level. Ministers, government-owned companies, unions, experts, organizations and other stakeholders can be invited to provide information and answer questions before Members of Parliament.

The decline from 65 to 42 committee meetings therefore deserves closer examination and a clear explanation from Parliament.

Declines Recorded Across Every Category

The annual report’s comparative figures show:

Meeting category

2024–2025

2025–2026

Decline

Public Meetings

23

21

2

Central Committee meetings

25

23

2

Committee meetings

65

42

23

Presidium meetings

8

5

3

Faction Leaders meetings

3

2

1

Total

124

93

31

Public Meetings declined by approximately 8.7%, while Central Committee meetings fell by 8%.

Presidium meetings decreased by 37.5%, and Faction Leaders meetings declined by approximately 33.3%.

Overall, Parliament recorded a decrease in every category included in the annual report’s year-to-year comparison.

Numbers Demand an Explanation

The figures alone do not establish that Parliament was less effective. The number of meetings does not necessarily measure the length, complexity, substance or quality of parliamentary deliberations.

The report also counts meetings by their official meeting numbers. A single numbered meeting can be adjourned and continued across several separate sittings, meaning the totals do not necessarily represent every day or occasion on which Parliament convened.

Nevertheless, meeting frequency remains one of the few objective measurements available to the public when assessing Parliament’s institutional activity.

Members of Parliament are full-time elected representatives entrusted with passing legislation, scrutinizing government policy, questioning ministers, reviewing public expenditure and approving the national budget. A 25% decline in overall meeting activity cannot simply be ignored.

Parliament should explain why it recorded 31 fewer meetings than in the previous parliamentary year, including why committee activity fell so sharply.

The public deserves to know whether the decline resulted from fewer matters being referred to committees, scheduling difficulties, ministerial availability, parliamentary priorities, administrative constraints or other factors.

Whatever the explanation, the official record is clear: based on Parliament’s own comparative figures, meeting activity declined across every major category during the reporting period.

PFP records just two written-question letters as National Alliance leads Parliament with 50.

pfpversesna12092026PHILIPSBURG:--- The Party for Progress (PFP), which has frequently emphasized accountability, transparency and parliamentary oversight, recorded just two written-question letters to ministers during the 2025–2026 Parliamentary Year, according to Parliament’s official Annual Report.

The result placed PFP second from the bottom among Parliament’s seven factions. Only the Soualiga Action Movement, which recorded no written-question letters, ranked lower.

According to Parliament’s “Questions by Faction” table, the National Alliance led all factions with 50 written-question letters. The Democratic Party followed with 24, the United People’s Party with 23, and the Unified Resilient St. Maarten Movement with 15.

Nation Opportunity Wealth recorded six, PFP recorded two, and SAM recorded none.

Faction

Written-question letters

National Alliance

50

Democratic Party

24

United People’s Party

23

URSM

15

NOW

6

PFP

2

SAM

0

At the individual level, PFP faction leader MP Raeyhon Peterson recorded one written-question letter, while fellow PFP MP Ludmila de Weever also recorded one.

A Formal Instrument of Oversight

The figures are significant because written questions are one of the formal constitutional tools available to Members of Parliament to scrutinize government and demand information from ministers.

Parliament’s annual report describes written questions as an important mechanism through which MPs obtain information, raise matters of public concern and hold ministers accountable for government actions and policies.

The report also makes clear that its statistics count letters containing written questions—not the total number of questions contained in those letters. A single letter may contain several questions and may be submitted jointly by two or more MPs.

Written-question figures therefore represent one measurable indicator of parliamentary oversight alongside attendance, motions, amendments, legislation and committee participation.

PFP’s Record Under Examination

PFP’s two written-question letters come against the background of the faction’s attendance record.

Peterson recorded 35% attendance at Central Committee sittings—the lowest rate among Parliament’s 15 MPs. The two-member PFP faction also recorded the lowest combined Public and Central Committee attendance rate among the seven factions, at approximately 62.8%.

Attendance and written questions do not measure every aspect of an MP’s performance. MPs may question ministers orally, introduce motions or legislation and perform constituency work outside formal parliamentary meetings.

Nevertheless, Parliament’s own figures provide objective benchmarks the public can use to evaluate how consistently elected representatives use the tools available to them.

For a party that has repeatedly demanded accountability from ministers and other public officials, recording only two written-question letters during an entire parliamentary year raises legitimate questions about how consistently PFP applied that principle through Parliament’s formal oversight system.

With the National Alliance recording 50 faction-attributed written-question letters and PFP recording only two, Parliament’s Annual Report presents a sharp contrast in the documented use of one of the legislature’s principal oversight tools.


Subcategories