Tax Administration Provides Clarity on Room Tax Exemption.

PHILIPSBURG:--- Following the many comments and questions received from the public, the Tax Administration wishes to provide clarity on what the law states regarding Room Tax and to whom it applies.

Under Article 1 of the Logeergastenbelastingverordening (A.B. 2016, No. 14), the law establishes who is subject to Room Tax. The article states:

"Onder de naam “logeergastenbelasting” wordt een directe belasting geheven:

a. terzake van het houden van verblijf in hotels, logementen, pensions, appartementen, woningen of andere tot onderkomen geschikte gebouwen tegen vergoeding in welke vorm dan ook door personen die niet in de basisadministratie van Sint Maarten zijn opgenomen."

Based on this, Room Tax applies to persons who are not registered in Sint Maarten’s Civil Registry. Therefore, registered residents of Sint Maarten are exempt from paying Room Tax when staying at local accommodations, such as hotels, lodgings, apartments, and guesthouses, provided that valid proof of residency, such as a Sint Maarten ID card, is presented.

The Tax Administration encourages all to familiarize themselves with the provisions of the law to ensure it is applied correctly.

Through continued public education efforts, the Tax Administration remains committed to ensuring that residents and businesses have access to accurate information regarding their rights and responsibilities under Sint Maarten’s tax laws.


CARDI Launches Inaugural Agricultural Research and Innovation Symposium to Advance Regional Food Security and Climate Resilience

cardiansari16072026 St Augustine. The Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute (CARDI) officially launched its inaugural Agricultural Research and Innovation Symposium (ARIS) on Wednesday, 8 July 2026, bringing together researchers, policymakers, farmers, development partners and private sector stakeholders from across the Caribbean to showcase science-driven solutions for building a more resilient and food-secure region.

Held under the theme "Advancing Agricultural Innovation for Sustainable and Climate-Resilient Food Systems," the Symposium serves as a platform for sharing CARDI's latest research and strengthening collaboration among regional institutions committed to transforming Caribbean agriculture.

Opening the Symposium, Chairman of CARDI's Board of Governors, the Hon. Lennox Andrews, Minister of Agriculture in Grenada, said the Caribbean must continue investing in research and innovation to address increasingly complex agricultural challenges.

"Climate change, evolving pest and disease pressures, and global market disruptions demand that we embrace science, innovation and collaboration as essential tools for securing the future of Caribbean agriculture. The research being showcased here demonstrates CARDI's commitment to developing practical solutions that improve productivity, strengthen food systems and support the livelihoods of farmers across our region."  He further added “If we want CARDI to keep providing solutions … we must give them the financial tools to do the job.”

CARDI Executive Director Ansari Hosein described the symposium as a significant milestone for the organisation and an important opportunity to reconnect with stakeholders.

"This Symposium marks the beginning of a new tradition for CARDI. It brings together our scientists from across the region to share the results of research conducted over the last 2 years in our Member States and, more importantly, to engage directly with farmers, policymakers, development partners and the private sector. Our objective is to ensure that research moves beyond the laboratory and delivers tangible benefits for food and nutrition security, climate resilience and agricultural competitiveness throughout the Caribbean."

He noted that CARDI's research programme continues to focus on strengthening resilient, innovative and sustainable agri-food systems capable of supporting the Region's food security goals.

Delivering remarks on behalf of Trinidad and Tobago's Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ministerial Advisor Ravi Pooran Maharaj commended CARDI for creating a regional forum dedicated to scientific collaboration and knowledge exchange.

"The Caribbean's future food security depends upon our collective ability to transform research into action. This Symposium provides an important platform where researchers, policymakers, innovators, and practitioners can exchange ideas, strengthen partnerships, and accelerate the adoption of technologies that will help transform agriculture across Trinidad and Tobago and the wider Caribbean."

He further noted that innovation in agriculture is no longer optional but essential, highlighting the importance of climate-smart technologies, improved crop varieties, precision agriculture and sustainable farming practices in building resilient food systems.

Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Michelle Anne Thomas, welcomed the Symposium as an important mechanism for strengthening collaboration between research institutions and the public sector, noting that ”the challenges facing Caribbean agriculture require strong partnerships between researchers, policymakers and producers. By creating opportunities to share knowledge and practical solutions, initiatives such as this Symposium help ensure that scientific research informs policy, strengthens national agricultural programmes and delivers meaningful benefits for farmers and consumers across the Region."

The Symposium featured three technical sessions highlighting CARDI's research programmes across its 14 Member States and addressing some of the Region's most pressing agricultural priorities.

Researchers presented studies exploring the commercial production potential of white potatoes in Grenada and tropical wheat in Belize, alongside innovations in lettuce, corn, silage, dasheen, and black-eyed pea production aimed at reducing dependence on imported food and feed.

The symposium also highlighted CARDI's growing emphasis on digital agriculture and innovation. Presentations examined youth engagement in agriculture, digital platforms for livestock feed management, AI-supported crop diagnostic tools, and emerging technologies that can strengthen agricultural extension services and improve on-farm decision-making throughout the Caribbean.

Collectively, the presentations reflected CARDI's commitment to delivering practical, science-based solutions that support regional food and nutrition security, improve farmer livelihoods and enhance the competitiveness of Caribbean agriculture.

Kadaster St. Maarten advances drone mapping collaboration with Cross-agency discussion.

btpkadaster16072026PHILIPSBURG:--- St. Maarten--Kadaster St. Maarten is helping to move drone technology from occasional use to a more coordinated tool for mapping, planning and disaster preparedness.

Kadaster, together with the Bureau of Telecommunications and Post St. Maarten, recently convened a cross-agency technical working session on the use of drones for mapping, data collection, professional training and public-sector planning.

The discussion focused on how government and public entities can make better use of drone-generated information, while ensuring that each agency’s role remains clear. For Kadaster, the work is directly connected to its core responsibilities: accurate mapping, reliable land and infrastructure information, and the careful management of spatial data used for planning and decision-making.

Kadaster operates a fleet of large, LiDAR-capable drones flown by European-certified pilots, supported by an established legal framework for government data collection and mapping. Recent applications include 3D mapping of the St. Maarten hospital complex, volume calculations related to waste management and soon to be executed, airport mapping and other public-sector assignments.

The Bureau of Telecommunications and Post St. Maarten contributed from the perspective of telecommunications, radio communications, pilot licensing and coordination related to drone registration and certification. This combination of mapping expertise and regulatory knowledge was central to the discussion.

Participants explored how drone mapping can support national priorities such as land-use planning, infrastructure development, disaster preparedness and public works. One practical area under consideration is the use of aerial before-and-after imagery following storms or other major events. Such documentation can assist with damage assessments, recovery planning and more accurate reporting after an emergency.

The session also considered the development of a professional drone training framework for agencies that operate drones or rely on drone-generated information. The proposed training would cover legal requirements, aviation standards, communications procedures, privacy considerations, operational safety and proper use of collected data.

Kadaster would contribute guidance on mapping standards, data accuracy and the appropriate use of spatial information, while the Bureau of Telecommunications and Post St. Maarten would support areas related to licensing, communications and regulatory requirements.

The possibility of future public drone awareness or training was also discussed. Participants noted that any public-facing initiative would need to clearly explain safety rules, legal responsibilities, privacy standards and liability concerns linked to recreational drone use.

This collaboration is part of a broader effort to modernise land, mapping and infrastructure information services. By making better use of drone technology and working more closely with relevant partners, Kadaster aims to support better planning, safer development and stronger disaster readiness for St. Maarten.

Kadaster will continue consultations with the Bureau of Telecommunications and Aviation Affairs department and other relevant public-sector partners to further develop the proposed areas of cooperation, including professional training, mapping standards, disaster documentation and the careful use of drone-generated information.

After 377 years, St. Maarten's border is finally being written into history.

~France completes parliamentary approval of historic border treaty; Dutch Kingdom still awaits final ratification.~

 

frenchdutchborder16072026PHILIPSBURG/MARIGOT:--- Nearly four centuries after French and Dutch settlers agreed to divide the island of St. Martin, one of the oldest unresolved international boundaries in the Caribbean is on the verge of finally being settled.

On Thursday, July 16, 2026, the French National Assembly adopted the bill authorizing the Agreement between the French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands establishing the international boundary between Saint-Martin and Sint Maarten to be approved. The vote marks the completion of France's parliamentary approval process for a treaty that finally defines, in legal and geographical terms, where French territory ends and Dutch territory begins.

The agreement, however, is not yet in force. Before it can take legal effect, the Kingdom of the Netherlands must complete its own parliamentary approval process through Kingdom Bill 36956 (R2220), which is still before the Dutch Parliament.

When that process is completed and both governments exchange diplomatic notifications confirming that their constitutional procedures have been fulfilled, history will be made.

For the first time since 1648, the entire border separating the French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands on the island will have a legally recognized and internationally ratified definition.

A Border Created in 1648—But Never Completely Defined

The story begins almost 378 years ago.

On March 23, 1648, representatives of France and the Dutch Republic signed what became known as the Treaty of Concordia.

The agreement divided the island between the two colonial powers after Spain abandoned its occupation.

The treaty established that both nations would peacefully coexist and that residents would enjoy freedom of movement between both territories.

But while the treaty determined which portions of the island belonged to each nation, it never established an exact border using modern surveying methods or geographical coordinates.

Instead, the border relied largely on natural landmarks, historical descriptions and mutual understanding.

For centuries, this informal arrangement functioned reasonably well.

People lived, worked, traded and crossed freely between both sides.

However, governments increasingly encountered legal uncertainty whenever questions arose involving:

  • land ownership,
  • coastal development,
  • Oyster Pond,
  • maritime jurisdiction,
  • environmental protection,
  • policing,
  • infrastructure,
  • disaster response,
  • public utilities,
  • and future investment projects.

The absence of an internationally defined boundary became more problematic as the island developed and technology made precise surveying possible.

Decades of Negotiations

According to the French parliamentary reports, discussions on formally defining the border have taken place for decades.

Experts from both governments conducted surveys, exchanged technical information and negotiated solutions to historically disputed sections.

The most difficult issues involved Oyster Pond (Étang aux Huîtres) and adjoining coastal waters.

Unlike inland areas where the border was generally accepted, Oyster Pond presented legal uncertainty over exactly where French jurisdiction ended and Dutch jurisdiction began.

The uncertainty affected navigation, environmental management, policing, permitting, development and emergency response.

Negotiations continued for more than twenty years before both governments finally reached agreement.

The Historic Signing

On May 26, 2023, representatives of both countries gathered at Belle Plaine/Belvédère to sign the treaty.

Representing the Kingdom of the Netherlands was then Prime Minister of Sint Maarten Silveria Jacobs.

Representing France was then Minister of the Interior and Overseas Territories Gérald Darmanin.

Although signed in 2023, the treaty could not become law immediately.

Under both French and Dutch constitutional systems, international treaties affecting national territory require parliamentary approval before they can enter into force.

France Moves First

France formally began the ratification process on February 25, 2026, when the government submitted Bill No. 437 to the French Senate.

On that same day, the French Government invoked the accelerated legislative procedure, recognizing the importance of the treaty.

The Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defense and Armed Forces examined the legislation and issued its report on April 8, 2026.

One week later, on April 15, the French Senate adopted the bill.

The legislation was immediately forwarded to the National Assembly on April 16, where it became Bill No. 2688.

The National Assembly's Foreign Affairs Committee studied the treaty in detail before filing Report No. 2996 on July 1.

Finally, on Thursday, July 16, 2026, the National Assembly approved the legislation without amendment under France's simplified examination procedure.

The adopted legislation became Text Adopted No. 333.

France had completed its parliamentary responsibility.

The Dutch Kingdom Still has Work to Do

Unlike France, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has not yet finalized its approval.

The Dutch Government introduced Kingdom Bill 36956 (R2220) on May 28, 2026.

The legislation is considered a Kingdom Act because the treaty concerns one of the autonomous countries within the Kingdom—Sint Maarten.

Although foreign affairs remain a Kingdom responsibility, territorial agreements affecting Sint Maarten require approval through the Kingdom legislative process.

The bill was referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs on June 3.

Committee members submitted written questions on June 24.

As of July 16, however, parliamentary debate and voting had not yet taken place.

Only after the Dutch Parliament completes its work can the Kingdom proceed toward ratification.

Why Oyster Pond Mattered So Much

One of the principal reasons for negotiating the treaty was Oyster Pond.

For generations, there were differing interpretations regarding where the international border passed through the lagoon.

This uncertainty affected numerous governmental responsibilities.

Questions arose over which government had authority to:

  • issue permits,
  • regulate marinas,
  • investigate environmental violations,
  • remove wrecks,
  • enforce laws,
  • supervise construction,
  • undertake dredging,
  • respond to emergencies.

Following Hurricane Irma in 2017, those questions became increasingly urgent.

Massive destruction required reconstruction on both sides of the island.

Government agencies needed legal certainty regarding jurisdiction before undertaking certain recovery projects.

The treaty finally establishes that certainty through precise coordinates contained in its annexes.

Not Just a Line on a Map

The treaty is far more than a simple border agreement.

It provides a comprehensive legal framework for managing the international boundary.

Among other matters, it addresses:

  • the precise land boundary,
  • maritime delimitation,
  • internal waters,
  • coastal waters,
  • official maps,
  • technical coordinates,
  • maintenance of boundary markers,
  • cooperation between authorities,
  • future surveys,
  • procedures if markers are damaged,
  • legal certainty for public administration.

Instead of relying upon historical descriptions dating back centuries, both governments will now use modern geodetic coordinates.

What Does Not Change

Despite dramatic headlines suggesting that France and the Netherlands are "getting a new border," residents should not expect dramatic changes in daily life.

There will be:

  • no wall,
  • no fence,
  • no customs barrier,
  • no passport checkpoints,
  • no interruption of free movement.

The island's open character remains unchanged.

Residents will continue crossing between both sides just as they have for generations.

The treaty determines legal jurisdiction—not the movement of people.

What Does Change

The agreement significantly strengthens legal certainty.

Government departments will know exactly where their authority begins and ends.

This affects:

  • police investigations,
  • judicial cooperation,
  • environmental enforcement,
  • land registration,
  • infrastructure projects,
  • marina regulation,
  • coastal development,
  • disaster response,
  • public works,
  • future investments.

Developers, engineers and surveyors will now work from officially recognized international coordinates instead of historical interpretations.

Why This is Important for St. Maarten

For Sint Maarten, the treaty represents more than an international formality.

It provides certainty for future generations.

Government decisions concerning Oyster Pond, coastal development, maritime management and environmental protection will rest upon internationally recognized boundaries.

Cross-border cooperation between French and Dutch authorities will also become easier because jurisdictional questions will be substantially reduced.

The agreement provides both governments with a common legal framework for resolving future issues rather than relying upon historical custom.

A Treaty Built for the Future

The agreement also establishes mechanisms for maintaining the boundary over time.

Modern surveying techniques make it possible to accurately relocate boundary points should markers disappear or be damaged.

Technical annexes accompany the treaty containing official maps and geographic coordinates.

Those annexes become part of the international agreement itself.

Still One Final Step

Although France has completed parliamentary approval, the treaty is not yet operational.

The Kingdom of the Netherlands must still complete its legislative process.

After parliamentary approval in both countries, the governments must exchange diplomatic notifications confirming that each has fulfilled its constitutional requirements.

Only then will the agreement formally enter into force.

The End of A 377-Year Legal Uncertainty

For nearly four centuries, the island has lived with an internationally recognized political division that was never completely defined in legal or geographical terms.

Generations accepted the border largely because tradition and cooperation prevailed.

But modern governance requires precision.

Today, satellite surveying, international law, environmental management, disaster planning and coastal development demand exact boundaries—not historical approximations.

The treaty approved by France this week represents the culmination of years of negotiations, technical surveys and diplomatic cooperation between two neighboring governments that share one of the most unique islands in the world.

Once the Dutch Kingdom completes its own parliamentary approval, the border first envisioned under the Treaty of Concordia in 1648 will finally become a fully defined international frontier.

It is a historic milestone not because it changes how the people of the island live, but because it brings legal certainty to one of the Caribbean's oldest shared frontiers.

For St. Maarten and Saint-Martin, it closes a chapter that remained unfinished for 377 years and opens a new era in which the island's shared history is matched by a clearly defined international boundary recognized by both nations.

Costs and practical barriers in school sick leave call for policy reform.

schoolsickleave16072026ORANJESTAD, ARUBA:--- The Ombudsman, Ms. Jurima Bryson, LL.M., also acting in her capacity as Children's Ombudsman, published the report "The Cost of Being sick" on July 13th, 2026. The report presents the findings of an own-initiative investigation into the sick leave policy within the Aruban education system. The investigation focused on the requirement that students submit a medical certificate, whether paid or unpaid, when they are unable to attend school due to illness, including during tests and examinations.

Why was this investigation conducted?
The Ombudsman initiated this investigation following signals received from parents, students, teachers, and other stakeholders indicating that students are often required to submit a medical certificate, particularly to reschedule a test or exam after being absent due to sickness. The Ombudsman also received indications that the absence of a medical certificate may affect a student's educational position.

In her role as Children's Ombudsman, special attention was paid during the investigation to the best interests of the child, the right to education, equal treatment, and the protection of privacy.
What are the findings of the investigation?
The investigation concluded that schools view policies as a means to prevent unauthorized absenteeism, ensure that reports of sickness can be verified, and promote equal treatment among students.

At the same time, the investigation found that the costs and practical requirements of obtaining a medical certificate pose a barrier for some students and their families.

The investigation also concluded that these policies vary from one school to another. As a result, there is not always sufficient clarity regarding the applicable rules, the individualized alternatives, and the consequences of failing to provide a medical certificate.

Why is this important?
Clear and carefully designed sick leave policies are important for preventing misuse and safeguarding the continuity of education. At the same time, students who are genuinely sick should not be unfairly disadvantaged.

The Ombudsman emphasizes that any measure affecting children must always consider the best interests and rights of the child, access to education, equal opportunities, proportionality, and the protection of privacy.

What does the Ombudsman recommend?
The Ombudsman makes several recommendations to the Minister of Education, the relevant educational institutions, and other responsible parties. Among other things, it is recommended to introduce clearer, more uniform sick leave policies, improve communication with students and parents about applicable rules, provide room for alternatives and individualized policies, reduce financial barriers, and strengthen protections for medical data.

The report represents a first step toward contributing to a better balance between preventing unauthorized absenteeism and protecting students who are genuinely sick.

Next steps
The Ombudsman will monitor the educational institutions’ progress in addressing these recommendations. The Ombudsman will also stay in contact with the Minister of Education, the relevant institutions and other stakeholders.

The full report “The Cost of Being sick” is available on the Ombudsman's website, www.ombudsman.aw/en/publications/.

Stay informed about the latest developments
The Office of the Ombudsman Aruba keeps the community informed through its following communication channels:
- Facebook: Ombudsman Aruba
- Instagram: ombudsmanaruba
- LinkedIn: Ombudsman Aruba


Subcategories