PHILIPSBURG:--- Day Three of the Strategic Economic Stakeholder Consultation Workshop moved the national conversation into deeper, more candid territory as government leaders and stakeholders gathered to examine policy alignment through economic, social, and labour lenses.
Described by participants as “not the most glamorous topic — but certainly one of the most necessary,” the morning session featured keynote presentations that challenged traditional thinking and advocated greater synchronization across sectors.
Reading Beyond Ourselves: Policy in Perspective
Opening the session, Senior Policy Advisor Jessica Rogers delivered a presentation centered on economic realities, policy modernization, and the need for cross-sector synchronization. Rogers emphasized that Sint Maarten does not lack ideas or initiatives but suffers from fragmentation, noting that progress slows when policies operate in silos rather than aligning with one another.
Her presentation emphasized that stakeholders must learn to read beyond their own interests, engaging with policies even when they do not directly affect their sector or personal interests. From TEATT’s perspective, the Ministry’s role is to examine dilemmas, challenges, and successes holistically, ensuring that economic growth, infrastructure planning, tourism development, and social realities are aligned.
Referencing current policy priorities, Rogers outlined why certain policies require modernization, including energy strategy, transportation frameworks, and investment diversification initiatives, stressing that conversations taking place this week are critical to updating policies for today’s realities. She reinforced that Sint Maarten’s economic pressures, ranging from infrastructure strain to housing and carrying-capacity challenges, require coordinated action rather than isolated decision-making.

Final Presentation - Stakeholde… Development and Its Social Footprint.

Following the economic policy discussion, Acting Department Head of Social Development Sharilyn Bryson presented a historical and social perspective, tracing Sint Maarten’s journey from the early 1900s to today. Her presentation illustrated how decades of development, migration, tourism expansion, and external shocks have shaped the island’s social well-being.
Bryson highlighted that while development has brought opportunity, it has also introduced complex social challenges, including an ageing population, rising cost of living, housing pressures, and evolving health concerns. Participants were reminded that economic advancement cannot be viewed in isolation from social realities, as every stage of growth leaves an imprint on communities and national well-being.
Her message underscored the importance of acknowledging historical trends when crafting future policy, encouraging stakeholders to consider the long-term social implications of economic decisions.

Labour Realities: “The Time for the People Is Now”
Closing the keynote segment, Division Head of Labor Affairs and Social Services Peggy Ann-Dros delivered a direct and unfiltered presentation on labour market realities, emphasizing that while data is widely available, the real challenge lies in how it is interpreted and applied.
Ann-Dros spoke candidly about recurring policy cycles, noting that terms such as resilience, strategic, and collaboration have been used repeatedly over the years without always producing tangible change. Her presentation addressed the realities faced by the labour department, including instances where employment permit applications were denied due to qualified local candidates being available, yet recruitment practices favored foreign hires, a phenomenon she described as ethnic recruitment.
She further highlighted legal and policy gaps that complicate decision-making, noting that in some cases, court rulings have upheld outcomes that expose weaknesses in existing policy frameworks. The presentation emphasized that balancing local protection, cultural dynamics, and investment remains one of Sint Maarten’s most pressing labour dilemmas, requiring decisive reform and stronger alignment between data, policy, and enforcement.

A Unified Message Despite Different Styles
Although each speaker approached the discussion from a different angle, economic policy, social development, and labour market reform, a common thread emerged throughout the morning session: Sint Maarten’s challenges are interconnected, and solutions must reflect a holistic national approach.
The session reinforced the workshop’s overarching theme, “Addressing Sint Maarten’s Crossroads; Charting a New Way Forward,” highlighting that meaningful progress will require honest dialogue, synchronized policies, and a willingness to confront difficult realities.
The Strategic Economic Stakeholder Consultation Workshop continues throughout the week at the Belair Community Center, bringing together government, private sector, and community voices to help shape the country’s forthcoming Strategic Economic Development Plan.

PHILIPSBURG:--- Serious questions are being raised about a potential conflict of interest involving Judianne Hoeve, the Head of the Bureau Telecommunication and Post (BTP). Appointed by National Decree to serve as the nation's chief telecommunications regulator, Hoeve has publicly promoted a foreign company, raising alarms about her commitment to the government-owned provider, TELEM, and about the integrity of her office.

The controversy stems from recent promotional activities where Hoeve, in her influential capacity, has lauded the services of a foreign-owned competitor. This has sparked outrage and concern because the BTP is mandated to provide impartial oversight of all telecommunications companies operating in the country. Its primary function is to ensure a level playing field and protect national interests, not to champion one private entity over another, especially at the expense of a state-owned enterprise.

This apparent endorsement is seen by many as a direct blow to TELEM, the national telecom provider. As a government-owned company, TELEM operates not just for profit but as a crucial piece of national infrastructure. For the head of the regulatory body to seemingly undermine its position in the market is viewed as a betrayal of public trust. The implications are significant, potentially leading to a loss of public confidence in TELEM and an unfair market advantage for its foreign competitor.

Critics argue that Hoeve's actions blur the lines between regulation and promotion, creating a glaring conflict of interest. "How can the public trust that the BTP is making unbiased regulatory decisions when its leader is actively cheerleading for a specific company?" asked one industry insider who wished to remain anonymous. "This goes against the very essence of what a regulatory body is supposed to do. It’s a watchdog, not a marketing agency."

The situation calls into question the ethical and legal framework governing officials in such powerful positions. An appointment by National Decree carries a profound responsibility to act in the public interest. Promoting a foreign corporation over a national asset appears to be a flagrant disregard for that duty. This has led to calls from various corners for a formal investigation into whether any laws or ethical guidelines have been breached.

The public reaction has been one of shock and disbelief. On social media and talk radio, citizens are questioning the allegiance of a top official appointed to safeguard their interests. The telecommunications industry, already highly competitive, is now unsettled by the regulator's questionable favoritism.

This troubling development demands immediate attention and full transparency. The public deserves to know the extent of the relationship between the Head of BTP and the foreign company she has promoted. There must be accountability for actions that threaten the stability of our national telecommunications infrastructure and erode trust in public institutions. A thorough and impartial investigation is no longer just an option; it is a necessity to restore integrity to the BTP office and ensure a fair and competitive market for all.

PHILIPSBURG:--- During a recent Council of Ministers press briefing, a pointed question was directed at the Minister of VROMI (Public Housing, Spatial Planning, Environment, and Infrastructure) regarding the ministry's resilience to corruption and its capacity for timely decision-making. The inquiry, prompted by public frustration over long waits for building permits and even simple address verifications, cut to the heart of a growing concern: are delays engineered to solicit bribes?

The Minister’s response was refreshingly direct, acknowledging that the current structure is not equipped to handle the demands of modern Sint Maarten. This admission opened a detailed discussion on the deep-seated systemic issues plaguing the ministry and the government's strategy to address them.

A System Stuck in 1935

A significant challenge highlighted by the Minister is the island's building ordinance, which dates back to 1935. This nearly century-old code was designed for a vastly different era, one of small chattel houses and simple construction. Today, VROMI staff are tasked with applying these outdated regulations to complex, multi-story condominium projects with modern amenities like central air conditioning—features not even contemplated by the original law.

This mismatch between antiquated rules and modern reality creates a bottleneck. The law mandates a one-month turnaround for permits, a feasible target when only a few homes were built per month. Now, the ministry receives dozens of applications each week, making the legally required timeline nearly impossible to meet with current processes. The Minister emphasized that while policies have been created over the years to bridge this gap, a comprehensive update to the building ordinance is a top priority for the ministry.

From Paper Files to Digital Solutions

The inefficiency is compounded by archaic, paper-based workflows. The Minister described a process where applicants must submit multiple physical copies of documents, which are then individually stamped and manually distributed. This cumbersome system is not only slow but also increases the potential for files to be misplaced or delayed.

To combat this, the ministry is actively exploring modernization. The conversation has turned towards digitalization and the use of technology, including AI, to streamline the review of complex documents and speed up the entire process. The goal is to create an environment that facilitates proper, efficient decision-making, thereby reducing the opportunities for corrupt practices to take root.

Tackling Systemic Disconnects

The problem extends beyond VROMI's internal processes. The Minister pointed to a significant historical disconnect between government departments, particularly VROMI and the Cadastre. This lack of alignment leads to frustrating and time-consuming issues for the public. For instance, a road might be listed under different names in VROMI and Cadastre records, or an address recognized by one department may not exist in the system of another.

Such discrepancies turn a seemingly simple task like an address verification into a complex inter-departmental project. The government is now working on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Cadastre to synchronize their data, a crucial step toward creating a more seamless and efficient public service experience.

Building Capacity for a Modern Government

Recognizing that policy changes alone are not enough, the ministry is also focused on building its human capacity. The existing government structure and hiring processes are slow and have not kept pace with the island's economic growth. To overcome this, the ministry has secured a 1.4 million euro subsidy to quickly bring in new personnel.

In an innovative move, the government is partnering with third-party agencies to hire eight new specialists who will join the ministry within weeks. This creative approach bypasses the lengthy traditional government hiring process, allowing VROMI to address its capacity shortages with the urgency required.

Broader Implications for Governance and Trust

The Minister's candid assessment reveals a government that is not shying away from its shortcomings. The issues within VROMI—outdated laws, inefficient processes, and departmental silos—are symptomatic of a broader challenge: the island's public infrastructure has not kept up with its rapid development.

By acknowledging that an inefficient system can create an environment where corruption might fester, the administration is taking a proactive stance. The focus is shifting from merely policing integrity to fundamentally fixing the broken processes that enable negative acts. This effort to modernize, streamline, and align government functions is about more than just efficiency. It is a critical move to restore public trust, support economic development, and build a government that is truly capable of serving the people of Saint Martin in the 21st century.

PHILIPSBURG:--- Minister of Justice Nathalie Tackling recently provided an update on the status of the immigration services backlog, reporting significant progress in processing applications. During a press briefing, the Minister indicated that her department is now largely operating within the legally mandated four-month decision period for complete applications.
This update follows previous statements from the Minister, who acknowledged the backlog was a serious issue, even suggesting it might be "man-made," and vowed to eliminate it entirely by January 2026.

According to Minister Tackling, progress is evident in the applications currently awaiting her final approval. She noted that she was recently signing off on permits submitted in early January, suggesting a much faster turnaround time than in previous months.
The Minister credited the dedicated staff at the admissions department for the improvements. "I know that the ladies are working very, very hard at admissions," she stated, highlighting their commitment. "They are sometimes there at six o'clock in the morning, already working into the nights, the weekends, so really doing their best to make up that backlog."

While acknowledging that some older files might still be in the system, Minister Tackling explained that delays are often due to incomplete applications. She clarified that if an application is missing required information, such as a work permit, the four-month processing clock does not start until the file is complete.
Based on the current workflow, the Minister expressed confidence that the major delays are a thing of the past. "I don't get the impression right now that there's an enormous backlog and that we're very much now sticking within that four-month period," she concluded.
When asked about a separate personnel matter concerning the head of immigration, Minister Tackling declined to comment, stating, "I won't comment in the press on any ongoing personnel matters within the ministry." The focus remains on streamlining the application process and delivering timely decisions for residents and businesses.