Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x

Five Years of Failure at NV GEBE.

~How Shareholder Representatives and Political Interference Have Kept Sint Maarten's Most Important Company in Permanent Crisis~

nvgebe10062026PHILIPSBURG:---  No private company could survive what NV GEBE has endured over the past five years.

No serious utility provider responsible for supplying electricity and water to an entire country should be subjected to the level of uncertainty, instability, and political interference that has become the norm at Sint Maarten's sole utility company.

Yet this is exactly what has happened.

While governments have come and gone, while Ministers and Prime Ministers have changed, while Supervisory Boards have been replaced, one thing has remained constant: the failure of the shareholder representatives to ensure stable and competent leadership at NV GEBE.

Today, the country once again faces uncertainty about the future management of its only utility company.

The question is no longer whether there is a governance crisis at NV GEBE.

The question is who should be held accountable for creating it.

The last stable Management Board

In 2015, the Government appointed a statutory management board consisting of Chief Executive Officer Kenrick Chittick, Chief Financial Officer Iris Arrindell, and Chief Operations Officer Veronica Webster -Jensen.

The three directors served their full statutory term.

Regardless of how one evaluates their performance, they provided one thing that has been absent ever since: stability.

Their five-year term ended in November 2020.

That was nearly six years ago.

Since then, NV GEBE has become trapped in an endless cycle of temporary appointments, management changes, political disputes, and uncertainty.

The fact that Sint Maarten's only utility company has operated for years without a stable permanent management structure should alarm every citizen.

Instead, it has become normalized.

A Revolving Door of Leadership

Following the expiration of the management board's term, the company entered one of the most unstable periods in its history.

Temporary managers became the norm rather than the exception.

Sharine Daniel was appointed as Temporary Manager.

Her tenure was short-lived.

Thereafter, Timmer Jimmy was appointed Temporary Manager and later elevated to the position of Statutory Director.

That appointment also ended abruptly.

The country witnessed yet another management disruption when he was dismissed, creating further uncertainty within the organization.

Then came Troy Washington.

On September 13, 2022, Washington was appointed Temporary Manager of NV GEBE.

Many employees viewed his appointment as an opportunity to restore some measure of stability.

By all accounts, Washington worked tirelessly to steer the company through one of the most difficult periods in its history.

Yet despite serving for years and despite efforts to formalize leadership at the company, he remained in a temporary capacity.

When Washington tragically passed away in March 2025, he was still not a permanently appointed CEO.

Think about that for a moment.

The man entrusted with running the country's only utility company remained in a temporary position years after his appointment.

If that does not represent a governance failure, what does?

Who Failed to Act?

The Supervisory Board of Directors cannot appoint a permanent management board on its own.

The appointment process requires the involvement and approval of shareholder representatives and ultimately the Government.

This is where real failure begins.

For years, recommendations were reportedly submitted.

Candidates were identified.

Processes were undertaken.

Discussions took place.

Yet the appointments never materialized.

The result was predictable.

Instead of establishing long-term leadership, NV GEBE was forced to continue operating under temporary arrangements.

The consequence of that failure has been enormous.

Employees lost confidence.

Strategic projects stalled.

Long-term planning has become increasingly difficult.

Institutional knowledge was disrupted.

The company became vulnerable to political influence.

Most importantly, the public's confidence in the organization continued to erode.

A Political Playground

The unfortunate reality is that many citizens have come to view government-owned companies as extensions of political power.

Every election seems to bring a new political reality.

Every new political reality seems to trigger discussions regarding boards and appointments.

Every new appointment brings speculation regarding political loyalties.

Every change creates uncertainty.

Meanwhile, the country continues to suffer.

Government-owned companies should never become bargaining chips in political negotiations.

Board appointments should never be viewed as rewards.

Executive positions should never be determined by political preferences.

These positions should be filled by the most qualified individuals available.

NV GEBE is not a social club.

It is not a political organization.

It is not a campaign office.

It is the company responsible for powering an entire nation.

Its leadership should be selected based on competence, experience, technical knowledge, and proven management ability.

Nothing else.

The Water Plant that Never Happened

One of the most frustrating examples of the country's failure to think strategically is the continued absence of a national water production facility.

Nearly a decade ago, discussions were taking place regarding the possibility of developing a water plant capable of providing Sint Maarten with greater independence and security.

The vision was simple.

Reduce dependence.

Increase national resilience.

Strengthen critical infrastructure.

Create long-term benefits for future generations.

Yet years later, that vision remains unrealized.

Governments have changed.

Boards have changed.

Managers have changed.

But the country still finds itself discussing many of the same issues that existed ten years ago.

The question citizens should ask is simple:

How many opportunities have been lost because long-term planning was sacrificed for short-term political considerations?

Another Temporary Appointment?

Now, NV GEBE once again finds itself at a crossroads.

Reports indicate that discussions are underway regarding yet another temporary management appointment.

If true, it would represent another chapter in a story that has become all too familiar.

Another temporary solution.

Another transitional period.

Another delay.

Another missed opportunity to provide the company with the stable leadership it desperately needs.

Employees are understandably concerned.

Many have spent years adapting to changing management structures.

Many have witnessed repeated shifts in direction.

Many are simply tired of the uncertainty.

They deserve better.

The Shareholder Representatives Must Be Held Accountable

The time has come to stop blaming everyone else.

The time has come to stop hiding behind procedures.

The time has come to stop pretending that this situation is normal.

It is not normal.

It is not acceptable.

And it is certainly not in national interest.

The shareholder representatives were entrusted with protecting the interests of NV GEBE and by extension the people of Sint Maarten.

That responsibility includes ensuring competent governance, stable leadership, and long-term strategic planning.

Looking at the events of the last five years, it is difficult to argue that those objectives have been achieved.

The facts speak for themselves.

One management board completed its term in November 2020.

Five years later, NV GEBE is still struggling to secure lasting executive leadership.

Five years later, temporary appointments continue.

Five years later, employees remain uncertain about the future.

Five years later, the country's most important company remains trapped in instability.

That is not success.

That is failure.

And until those responsible are willing to put the interests of the country above politics, NV GEBE will continue to pay the price.

Unfortunately, so will the people of Sint Maarten.


Soualigans Develop Environmental Justice Statement During St. Martin Book Fair

taziobervoets20022026ST. MARTIN:---  As part of the 2026 St. Martin Book Fair, residents from across the island gathered at the University of St. Martin on June 6 for a community session entitled “Soualigans, We Need You,” where they worked collectively to develop an Environmental Justice Statement for St. Martin.

Rather than attending a traditional presentation, participants were invited to contribute directly to the development of the statement. Through a facilitated process, residents responded to three questions: What do we love? What are we losing? What do we want? Every response was recorded, discussed, and prioritized ensuring that each participant had an equal voice in determining the final outcome.

The resulting statement begins with a clear declaration: “Soualiga – St. Martin – is our home, our inheritance, and our responsibility.” It recognizes that the island’s natural environment is not separate from its future development but forms the foundation of its health, culture, economy, and resilience. The statement is organized around four themes: what residents believe, what they are losing, what they demand, and what they commit to protecting.

Throughout the discussion, participants expressed concern about the continued loss of natural and cultural landmarks across the island. Residents reflected on the disappearance or degradation of places such as the old scenic road to Point Blanche, Flamingo Pond, the wetland at Dawn Beach, and many of the mature trees that once defined the landscape. Concerns were also raised about the pace of hillside and high-rise development and the limited environmental safeguards currently in place.

Participants highlighted that Sint Maarten remains the only jurisdiction within the Dutch Caribbean that does not require environmental and social impact assessments for major developments. They also noted that existing policies intended to protect beaches, hillsides, and significant trees often remain unenforced.

Water security emerged as one of the strongest themes of the day. Residents reflected on the loss of public freshwater springs and the increasing dependence on purchased drinking water despite living on a tropical island. Participants also recalled that during Hurricane Irma, many households relied on traditional wells when centralized water systems failed. As a result, the statement calls for the identification, protection, restoration, and sustainable management of the island’s springs, wells, and freshwater resources.

The statement outlines eight key demands directed to decision-makers on both the Dutch and French sides of the island. These include strengthening and enforcing environmental protections for beaches, hillsides, and trees; introducing mandatory environmental and social impact assessments on the Dutch side; establishing a protected national park; creating formal mechanisms for community participation in decision-making; safeguarding freshwater resources; strengthening cross-border cooperation on shared ecosystems and sargassum management; expanding environmental and cultural education in schools; and developing sustainable financing mechanisms that support both conservation and local communities.

A recurring message throughout the session was the importance of meaningful public participation. Participants emphasized that residents must be included in decisions affecting the future of the island and that local knowledge should be recognized as an essential part of environmental planning and conservation.

The statement concludes with a commitment to future generations: “The Soualiga we protect today is the Soualiga our grandchildren will inherit.”

The session, which formed part of the 2026 St. Martin Book Fair programme, was facilitated by Tadzio Bervoets, Chair of the UNESCO Ocean Decade Task Force for Latin America and the Caribbean, environmental management specialist, and co-founder of the Caribbean Shark Coalition. The final statement will be shared with government representatives, institutions, and stakeholders across the island.

ODM: Remain Vigilant and Monitor MDS Weather Reports for Potential Storm Activity.

odmeoc10062026PHILIPSBURG (DCOMM):---  Fire Chief and National Disaster Coordinator (NDC) of the Office of Disaster Management (ODM) Clive Richardson, is calling on residents and the business community to remain vigilant and monitor local weather reports from the Meteorological Department of St. Maarten (MDS): www.meteosxm.com or visit their social media page Facebook.com/sxmweather/ in connection with the 2026 Atlantic hurricane season.

The latest forecast from the Colorado State University (CSU) Department of Atmospheric Science of June 10 anticipates a below-normal season with 11 named storms, of which five (5) could become hurricanes, and of those two (2) could become major hurricanes with wind speeds of 111+ miles per hour.

Regardless of an active or below-normal season, it is still important to take all necessary preparations.

ODM calls on the community to double check their disaster supply kit which should be in place from the beginning of the hurricane season.

The disaster supply kit should have at least seven days of food and water. If you haven’t compiled such, the time to do so is now! Don’t wait for the last moment to be storm/hurricane ready.

The 2026 storm names are: Arthur, Bertha, Cristobal, Dolly
Edouard, Fay, Gonzalo, Hanna, Isaias, Josephine, Kyle, Leah, Marco, Nana, Omar, Paulette, Rene, Sally, Teddy, Vicky, and Wilfred.

The community is urged to learn more about hurricane hazards and resources you need on how to prepare your family, home, or business for a storm/hurricane strike by visiting the Government website: www.sintmaartengov.org/hurricane where you will be able to download your “Hurricane Season Readiness Guide’ and “Hurricane Tracking Chart.” The information here is also valuable for new residents.

Residents, visitors and business owners and operators should know the difference between a watch and warning.

A Tropical Storm Watch is issued when tropical storm conditions of sustained winds of 39 to 73 miles per hour are possible within a specified area within 48 hours; a Tropical Storm Warning means tropical storm conditions can be expected within 36 hours. A tropical storm does not have to reach hurricane strength to be deadly.

A Hurricane Watch means hurricane conditions are possible within the watch area, with tropical storm force winds beginning within 48 hours; a hurricane warning means hurricane conditions are expected somewhere within the warning area, with tropical storm force winds beginning within 36 hours.

Listen to the Government Radio station – SXMGOV 107.9FM - for official information and news before, during and after a hurricane. You can also follow weather related news and information as well as national addresses by the Prime Minister, chairperson of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) by going to @SXMGOV Facebook Page.

For official weather-related information, rely on forecasts that can be found at the website of the Meteorological Department of St. Maarten (MDS): www.meteosxm.com or visit their social media page Facebook.com/sxmweather/

Remember, it only takes one hurricane to make it a bad season. Remain vigilant and prepared!

The hurricane season runs through November 30.

CBCS Hosts the XLIII Annual Conference of the Caribbean Group of Banking Supervisors.

WILLEMSTAD:--- From May 28 to 30, 2026, the Centrale Bank van Curaçao en Sint Maarten (CBCS) hosted the XLIII Annual Conference of the Caribbean Group of Banking Supervisors (CGBS), bringing together banking supervisors, regulators, and financial sector experts from across the Caribbean and beyond. This year, Curaçao served as host of the CGBS Annual Conference for the second time since 2010. This year’s theme “Resilience and Innovation: Reimagining Supervision Amid Artificial Intelligence Risks, Data Protection and Systemic Uncertainty,” explored how supervisory authorities can effectively respond to an increasingly complex and rapidly evolving financial landscape.
In his opening remarks, CBCS President Richard Doornbosch highlighted the importance of regional cooperation and adaptive supervision in addressing emerging risks. Over the course of the conference, keynote speakers and panel discussions further shared insights on topics including artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, operational resilience, climate-related financial risks, data protection, financial inclusion, and the modernization of supervisory frameworks. Speakers represented institutions such as the Central Bank of Belize, the Bank of Jamaica, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA), the Central Bank of The Bahamas, the Alliance for Financial Inclusion of Latin America & Caribbean region, the SQL Power Group (Ireland), the Bermuda Monetary Authority, the Insurance and Pensions Advisory Board of the Toronto Centre (Canada), and the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB).
A key focus of the conference was the growing impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector and the role of supervisors in balancing innovation with sound risk management. Participants also exchanged experiences and best practices aimed at strengthening supervisory effectiveness and promoting financial stability throughout the region.
The CBCS looks back on a successful collaboration with the CGBS and looks forward to the continuation of knowledge sharing within our region to strengthen financial supervision across the Caribbean.

 

 


Willemstad, June 10, 2026
CENTRALE BANK VAN CURAÇAO EN SINT MAARTEN

PM Cornered on Healthcare and Governance Issues.

~Parliament Presses for Answers as Key Questions Remain Outstanding~

parliamentagendapoint07042026PHILIPSBURG:---  Prime Minister Dr. Luc Mercelina spent hours defending government policies, healthcare reforms, and political decisions during a tense parliamentary meeting that exposed growing concerns among Members of Parliament over accountability, transparency, and the future direction of healthcare regulation in Sint Maarten.

The public meeting, convened to continue discussions on matters previously raised by Members of Parliament, evolved into a broad examination of government policy, ministerial conduct, healthcare credentialing, educational statistics, and party governance. While the Prime Minister addressed several issues directly, lawmakers repeatedly expressed frustration over what they viewed as incomplete responses to critical questions.

The session ultimately concluded with a commitment from Mercelina to provide written responses to approximately 32 outstanding clarification requests within 1 week.

Healthcare Qualifications Become Center of Debate

One of the most detailed exchanges during the meeting focused on the qualifications and legal standing of healthcare professionals, particularly those serving as house officers in the medical system.

Responding to questions from MP Darryl York, the Prime Minister offered an extensive explanation based on his own experience as a surgeon.

Mercelina explained that a house officer is a physician who has completed university medical training and earned a medical degree but has not yet entered a specialized medical field. These doctors often work within hospital departments, assisting specialists while gaining clinical experience and determining their future medical careers.

The Prime Minister described the house officer as an essential component of hospital operations, responsible for patient admissions, monitoring patient progress, coordinating care plans, conducting ward rounds, and serving as an extension of specialist physicians.

However, despite the lengthy explanation, MP York indicated that the response did not fully address the core concern.

The parliamentarian sought clarity not on the practical duties of house officers but on their precise legal classification under healthcare regulations. Questions remained regarding whether house officers should be considered junior physicians, general practitioners, family doctors, or another professional category entirely.

Recognizing the need for greater clarity, Mercelina agreed to provide Parliament with a detailed written breakdown of healthcare professional classifications and licensing requirements.

The exchange highlighted broader concerns about medical regulation and the interpretation of professional qualifications within Sint Maarten's healthcare system.

Ongoing Concerns About Medical Registration

The discussion expanded into a larger debate surrounding healthcare licensing and the barriers faced by qualified professionals seeking employment in Sint Maarten.

Mercelina acknowledged concerns raised by MPs about locally trained healthcare professionals who have difficulty returning home to practice after completing their studies abroad.

The Prime Minister argued that existing regulatory structures create unnecessary obstacles and often rely too heavily on specific registration systems rather than on broader evaluations of professional competence.

He cited examples involving internationally respected specialists from Latin America, particularly Colombia, whose expertise is routinely trusted when Sint Maarten patients are referred overseas for treatment. Yet those same specialists may face challenges obtaining authorization to practice locally because of regulatory requirements.

According to Mercelina, such inconsistencies reveal weaknesses in the current framework governing healthcare credentials.

The Prime Minister emphasized that the government's proposed Healthcare Professional Registry is intended to modernize the system, establish transparent qualification standards, and create a pathway for qualified professionals—including Sint Maarteners educated abroad—to contribute to the local healthcare sector.

Supporters of the initiative argue that it could help address longstanding shortages in healthcare personnel while reducing dependence on foreign recruitment.

Critics, however, remain concerned that changes to registration requirements could lower standards if not implemented carefully.

Prime Minister Corrects Public Statements on Family Medicine Certifications

Healthcare issues resurfaced when Mercelina addressed earlier statements about the number of certified family medicine practitioners currently practicing in the country.

The Prime Minister admitted that earlier figures provided to him were inaccurate.

He explained that he had initially been informed that only four of the nineteen doctors working in primary healthcare held family medicine certification.

Subsequent verification revealed different numbers.

Mercelina informed Parliament that the correct figure is nine certified family medicine practitioners among twenty-one doctors currently working in frontline healthcare services.

The correction was welcomed by several members, though it also prompted discussion regarding the reliability of information provided to government officials and the importance of accurate public communication on healthcare matters.

Education Statistics Spark Political Dispute

Another contentious issue centered on comments previously attributed to the Prime Minister about the education levels of Sint Maarten's population.

Mercelina firmly rejected claims that he had described citizens as "uneducated."

Instead, he reiterated a statistic he has cited publicly on numerous occasions: approximately forty-two percent of the population has not completed secondary education.

The Prime Minister stressed that educational attainment and intelligence should not be confused.

He argued that individuals without formal secondary school diplomas may still possess extensive skills, experience, and practical knowledge that contribute meaningfully to society.

Nevertheless, opposition members suggested that previous public remarks may have created perceptions that portions of the population were being characterized negatively.

The exchange underscored broader political sensitivities surrounding education, social mobility, and economic opportunity on the island.

Parliamentary Questions on Ministerial Accountability

As the meeting progressed, several Members of Parliament voiced frustration over what they considered inadequate responses to governance-related questions.

MP York openly challenged the Prime Minister's decision to postpone answers to several issues involving ministerial accountability and government decision-making.

Among the unresolved questions were inquiries into the standards applied to ministers accused of misconduct, the consistency of government policy enforcement, and the legal interpretations that guide certain executive decisions.

York noted that the Prime Minister has historically been willing to answer difficult parliamentary questions directly and expressed disappointment that several straightforward inquiries remained unanswered.

The criticism reflected broader opposition concerns regarding transparency and equal application of government standards.

Mercelina maintained that some questions required legal consultation before definitive responses could be provided and reiterated his commitment to submitting comprehensive written answers.

Party Policy on Vacated Parliamentary Seats

Political accountability also emerged during discussions concerning parliamentary representation and party discipline.

Responding to a question from MP Duran, the Prime Minister clarified his party's position regarding elected officials who leave Parliament to accept ministerial appointments.

According to Mercelina, the party's longstanding understanding is that once a parliamentarian vacates a seat to serve in the executive branch, that individual should not expect to reclaim the seat later.

The Prime Minister stated unequivocally that there are no plans to revisit this principle.

The response may prove significant as political observers continue to monitor relationships between Parliament and the Council of Ministers, particularly during periods of governmental restructuring.

Representation on the Saba Bank

Questions regarding national representation on important resource-management bodies also surfaced during the meeting.

MP Sarah Wescot-Williams Labega inquired whether Sint Maarten currently maintains representation within the governance structure of the Saba Bank.

Mercelina confirmed that the country remains represented and announced an upcoming change in leadership.

According to the Prime Minister, Mr. Tazio Bervoets has been serving as Sint Maarten's representative but is scheduled to be replaced by Mr. Kevin James following a shareholder meeting set for June 17.

The announcement provided assurance that Sint Maarten's interests remain formally represented within discussions concerning one of the region's most valuable marine resources.

Mediation Proposal in Political Dispute Confirmed

A separate line of questioning focused on tensions involving former Minister Brug and the URSM party.

MP Sjamira Roseburg asked whether mediation had ever been considered as a means of resolving disagreements between the parties involved.

Mercelina confirmed that mediation had indeed been proposed.

According to the Prime Minister, discussions with the minister began in early 2025 and continued for an extended period. While mediation was eventually suggested by MP Roseburg, government leaders believed the conflict had already progressed too far for such intervention to be effective.

The Prime Minister, nevertheless, publicly acknowledged Roseburg's efforts and recognized her proposal as a constructive attempt to seek resolution.

Mental Health Facility Dossier Submitted to Parliament

Toward the conclusion of the meeting, Parliament received confirmation that a complete dossier relating to the island's mental health facility had been delivered through confidential parliamentary channels.

The Chairperson informed Members that all relevant documentation was now available for review.

Although the contents were not discussed publicly during the meeting, the submission is expected to play an important role in future parliamentary oversight and policy discussions concerning mental healthcare services.

Meeting Adjourned Pending Written Responses

After several hours of debate, Parliament agreed to suspend the session until the Prime Minister submits written responses to the remaining clarification requests.

Mercelina requested approximately one week to prepare answers, a timeline accepted by the Chair.

The continuation of the meeting is expected after Members receive the documentation and have an opportunity to review both the Prime Minister's responses and the additional healthcare-related materials he promised to provide.

The next phase of parliamentary scrutiny is likely to focus heavily on healthcare reform, licensing regulations, ministerial accountability, and the government's broader approach to governance.

For many observers, the meeting highlighted both the complexity of the issues facing Sint Maarten and the increasing demand among lawmakers for detailed answers, measurable reforms, and greater transparency from the country's leadership.


Subcategories

Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x

RADIO FROM VOICEOFTHECARIBBEAN.NET

Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x