
Labour mediator Kenneth Lopes and WIFOL President Theophilus Thompson made clear that if the pertinent laws were in place then the unionism would be stronger and workers would have had better job security. Members of the National Alliance faction who requested the meeting asked Thompson about article 34 of the Collective Labour Agreement that was signed by the management of Royal Resorts and the Union in 2009 and if that article is applicable in the discussions he engaged with the new management companies. Thompson assured parliament that it was because of that article and another article he identified in another CLA as article 32 that forced the new management company to agree to hire 145 workers indefinitely. The unionist said that the new management company presented three proposals during the weeks of negotiations he held with them and the first two were rejected by the union.

James also participated in the parliamentary debate on Thursday even though the chairlady of parliament Gracita Arrindell told SMN News last Tuesday that when this meeting is called James would have had to recluse himself from the meeting. It turned out that based on the rules of order James is allowed to participate in the debate but he would not have been allowed to vote if that was needed.
The National Alliance faction also showed that while there is a paper trail to show that the names of the companies have changed, the lawyers and workers are the same, yet the company wanted to get rid of the workers who have worked for the company for years and to rehire them on short term contracts or outsource labour to Mexicans. Another high point discussed with the labour mediator and union was the fact that Pelican Resort is short staffed and there are already three local companies working for Royal Resorts as outsourcing companies. Leader of the National Alliance William Marlin asked what sense does this make. The company he said is short staffed and they are outsourcing work to outside companies who may have personal interest to those working in management or the current political arena. Member of Parliament Louie Laveist said he fought for years to protect workers and the political party to which he was affiliated could not care less about protecting the labour market. Laviest further said he was the only elected person under the Democratic Party who fought for the increase in minimum wage which he finally secured.

The entire audio of the parliamentary proceedings is below we urge our readers to take the time out and listen to the audio we have provided.



