Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x

Subject: Urgent appeal from the people of the Dutch Caribbean islands to the CARICOM and Latin America.

Excellency,

I would like to congratulate your excellency and the secretariat on attending the upcoming meeting in Montevideo, Uruguay. In reference to the escalating Venezuela crisis and our previous letters of June 11, 2018 urging the CARICOM and the Caribbean region to intervene and object to prevent an armed conflict in the Caribbean and recent letter dated January 29th, 2019, as the crisis and conflict is deepening we herewith would like to request your urgent attention and call to action on behalf of the peoples of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, Curacao and Aruba.

By now it is very clear and obvious that the provocation and escalation is initiated and led by mayor world powers headed by the UK, France and the Netherlands and backed by the US as we witnessing a continuing military build up in Curacao, the ABC islands. We the people of the ABC islands highly object to be dragged into this conflict.

As the discussion is fundamentally based on the issue of democracy and human rights, the so-called ultimatum headed by these colonizing powers is directed towards a new election to re-elect a democratic president and government for the peoples of Venezuela we would like to illustrate herewith the hypocritical position taken by the government of the Netherlands (member of the UN Security Council) a front-runner in this provocation and escalation of this crisis.

The autonomous democratic Caribbean islands forming the country Netherlands Antilles in the Dutch Kingdom was dissolved and disintegrated on October 10, 2010. The Netherlands which maintained ultimate unilateral legislative and judiciary powers in the Dutch Kingdom abused these powers to continue with colonialism in the Caribbean region.

The more dense populated islands Aruba, Sint Maarten and Curacao, something what is not so obvious to outside world, they were all stripped from their autonomy and are back under Dutch control and rule. The Dutch which controls and decides on the budget (and judiciary) of the Curacao government, headed by the Secretary of State Mr. Knops, a ex-military and ex-lieutenant active in the Iraq war, forced the prime minister of Curacao, Mr Rhuggenaath which is subordinated to the Hague powers to escalation of the crisis. Curacao Prime Minister Rhugenaath publicly sided with the ultimatum for a new election causing a direct interference in the sovereign neighboring country Venezuela internal affairs. Curacao which as Aruba, the closest Caribbean islands to Venezuela, are equipped with a full US military forward base and with international harbors and airports of military standards are at the moment converted in the most strategic war-campaign-bases. War planes are already landing and troops are deployed from the Netherlands towards the ABC islands under guidance of Dutch brigade-general Peter Jan de Vin which was deployed to Curacao to overseer this military operation along with State Secretary Mr Knops.

The less populated in-defensive islands of Saba, Sint Eustatius and Bonaire were annexed, integrated and incorporated in the Dutch constitution without equal rights, with all administrating, democratic, judiciary, powers unilaterally re-positioned under the Dutch parliament in the Hague and at the moment are being governed in a colonial status against the free will of the peoples and not of their choosing.
As the Dutch government is preaching or claiming to support democracy and human rights in Venezuela meanwhile Bonaire is in a heavy humanitarian crisis by neutralizing and erasing their democratic and human rights. Imposing unilaterally laws for a systematic institutionalized ethnic cleansing of the local population, explosion of the crude death rate over 60% and massive immigration over 400% increase of non-Bonerians. At the moment in a short period, the local Bonerians became a minority on their own island and there is no stopping to this displacement and extermination process.

On Sint Eustatius, the democratically elected local government were un-democratically removed from power, with claims of corruption without proof or formal investigation by the Dutch government with abusive use of legislative , military and police powers. The Dutch appointed a non-democratic ruler to govern and erased the peoples democratic rights by stopping elections on the island till further notice. Note that the government of Sint Eustatius is the only Dutch Caribbean island which stood up against the Dutch government because illegal annexation on October 10, 2010 and presently are in court-proceedings against the Dutch government.

These mayor developments are contributing to re-establishing colonial regiments back in the Caribbean and these re-colonized territories are misused as this Venezuela case and crisis is unfolding to destabilize the region and vision towards a united and integrated Caribbean.

Our urgent call to attention and action is towards the Caricom countries and our Caribbean and Latin American brothers and sisters for supporting our islands of Bonaire and Sint Eustatius in our quest to get re-inscribed back on the list of the Non-Self-Governing-Territories of the United Nations and fall back under the scrutiny of the international community on our way back to regain and restore our fundamental human and democratic rights.

 Yours sincerely,

James Finies, president Foundation We Want Bonaire Back

 

 

 

 

 

 

Excellency,

I would like to congratulate your excellency and the secretariat on attending the upcoming meeting in Montevideo, Uruguay. In reference to the escalating Venezuela crisis and our previous letters of June 11, 2018 urging the CARICOM and the Caribbean region to intervene and object to prevent an armed conflict in the Caribbean and recent letter dated January 29th, 2019, as the crisis and conflict is deepening we herewith would like to request your urgent attention and call to action on behalf of the peoples of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, Curacao and Aruba.

By now it is very clear and obvious that the provocation and escalation is initiated and led by mayor world powers headed by the UK, France and the Netherlands and backed by the US as we witnessing a continuing military build up in Curacao, the ABC islands. We the people of the ABC islands highly object to be dragged into this conflict.

As the discussion is fundamentally based on the issue of democracy and human rights, the so-called ultimatum headed by these colonizing powers is directed towards a new election to re-elect a democratic president and government for the peoples of Venezuela we would like to illustrate herewith the hypocritical position taken by the government of the Netherlands (member of the UN Security Council) a front-runner in this provocation and escalation of this crisis.

The autonomous democratic Caribbean islands forming the country Netherlands Antilles in the Dutch Kingdom was dissolved and disintegrated on October 10, 2010. The Netherlands which maintained ultimate unilateral legislative and judiciary powers in the Dutch Kingdom abused these powers to continue with colonialism in the Caribbean region.

The more dense populated islands Aruba, Sint Maarten and Curacao, something what is not so obvious to outside world, they were all stripped from their autonomy and are back under Dutch control and rule. The Dutch which controls and decides on the budget (and judiciary) of the Curacao government, headed by the Secretary of State Mr. Knops, a ex-military and ex-lieutenant active in the Iraq war, forced the prime minister of Curacao, Mr Rhuggenaath which is subordinated to the Hague powers to escalation of the crisis. Curacao Prime Minister Rhugenaath publicly sided with the ultimatum for a new election causing a direct interference in the sovereign neighboring country Venezuela internal affairs. Curacao which as Aruba, the closest Caribbean islands to Venezuela, are equipped with a full US military forward base and with international harbors and airports of military standards are at the moment converted in the most strategic war-campaign-bases. War planes are already landing and troops are deployed from the Netherlands towards the ABC islands under guidance of Dutch brigade-general Peter Jan de Vin which was deployed to Curacao to overseer this military operation along with State Secretary Mr Knops.

The less populated in-defensive islands of Saba, Sint Eustatius and Bonaire were annexed, integrated and incorporated in the Dutch constitution without equal rights, with all administrating, democratic, judiciary, powers unilaterally re-positioned under the Dutch parliament in the Hague and at the moment are being governed in a colonial status against the free will of the peoples and not of their choosing.
As the Dutch government is preaching or claiming to support democracy and human rights in Venezuela meanwhile Bonaire is in a heavy humanitarian crisis by neutralizing and erasing their democratic and human rights. Imposing unilaterally laws for a systematic institutionalized ethnic cleansing of the local population, explosion of the crude death rate over 60% and massive immigration over 400% increase of non-Bonerians. At the moment in a short period the local Bonerians became a minority on their own island and there is no stopping to this displacement and extermination process.

On Sint Eustatius the democratically elected local government were un-democratically removed from power, with claims of corruption without proof or formal investigation by the Dutch government with abusive use of legislative , military and police powers. The Dutch appointed a non-democratic ruler to govern and erased the peoples democratic rights by stopping elections on the island till further notice. Note that the government of Sint Eustatius is the only Dutch Caribbean island which stood up against the Dutch government because illegal annexation on October 10, 2010 and presently are in court-proceedings against the Dutch government.

These mayor developments are contributing to re-establishing colonial regiments back in the Caribbean and these re-colonized territories are misused as this Venezuela case and crisis is unfolding to destabilize the region and vision towards a united and integrated Caribbean.

Our urgent call to attention and action is towards the Caricom countries and our Caribbean and Latin American brothers and sisters for supporting our islands of Bonaire and Sint Eustatius in our quest to get re-inscribed back on the list of the Non-Self-Governing-Territories of the United Nations and fall back under the scrutiny of the international community on our way back to regain and restore our fundamental human and democratic rights.

 

Yours sincerely,

James Finies, president Foundation We Want Bonaire Back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Female 911 operator allegedly abused women.

Dear Editor, I decided to write about my recent experience only because I read about someone else who had a similar experience. Recently I read about a woman who had difficulties with a female 911 operator. I’m choosing to share my experience after reading that I might not be the only one who has been victimized by this female police officer answering emergency calls. I read the letter to the editor this past week about a 911 dispatcher & laughed. Keep in mind that I did not laugh as in haha that's funny, I laughed a sad laugh. A wow, I’m not the only one to have been completely disrespected by a woman on the local police force on the Dutch side of the “friendly island”. I was & have been physically & mentally abused by a man over the years. I finally decided to report him. I regret that 911 call. The female police officer who took my call asked me “what did you do to provoke him to beat on you”. Yes, that's what she asked me. The conversations I believe are recorded so the proof is there should I ever want to take this further. I must come to the conclusion that this is a very bad apple in the bunch of police officers that are answering 911 calls. As the writer's situation sounded far too familiar with the terrible attitude I received making me feel as though I was at fault. In the end, the police force of St Maarten did not help me. I did, however, contact Safe Haven who was able to offer advice, talk calmly, relate to my situation. Women, if you are having a problem with a man I suggest you contact Safe Haven for help. The police force is obviously not trained to assist women with domestic abuse issues.
I’d like to throw this question out to the Chief of police & I look very forward to your response to the media & to the women on this island...is there a problem with the women on your force? Why is it that the women police officers speak so badly to other women? How dare they feel screaming & pointing their finger in a woman's face is acceptable to get their point across. I AM not an animal...Are they trying to fit in with the macho men? Do they resent other women may be of different nationalities? I have yet to meet a woman police officer, again, on the Dutch side of the “Friendly Island” who was in-fact an emotionally stable individual, able to keep her emotions out of the situation, deal with the situation she was called out to attend. Instead of straying off to, who is your neighbour, her friend is my neighbour, that officer is my friend, I don’t like that you are more educated than me, I don't like your house is bigger than mine, & finally... I don’t like anyone with lighter skin than me. Please keep in mind that this is not my opinion, This is a recent personal experience. Anyone out there who feels the local St Maarten policewomen are not biased, well, you are their friend, relative, neighbour etc & finally, I bet your vehicle has & black tinted windows & no officers peel it off...you are not 1 of us common folk. There are 2 types of people on this island. The ones connected to the local police force by blood or friendship..then there are us stupid folk who are forced to bow to them or we end up being yelled at by a female officer as she points her finger into your eye.

To end this on a positive note as I believe there are many positives within this said “friendly island” police force. There is a senior male police officer who works as a 911 dispatcher. Words cannot explain the compassion this particular individual has shown. I do hope to cross paths with him 1 day as I will never forget the patience to listen to my story, the understanding & non-judgemental advice. In every fruit basket we find a rotten, however, I assure you the St Maarten police force has some seasoned gentlemen that are ready to help any woman, child or man in need of help. If you find yourself in a helpless situation, woman, call Safe haven before making any bad decision.
I choose to withhold my name as unfortunately the women on the force are prone to targeting an individual for making a complaint & I can be sure they will target my family for writing this. It is a sad day when the police force cannot be trusted due to high strung emotions & mafia-like behaviour. I’m hoping more women feel comfortable to share their experiences & eventually see a better-educated Police force. Again, I look forward to the Chief of Police addressing this obvious hidden issue.

Authors name withheld upon request.

Glenda Dollison Responds to allegations.

A number of persons brought to my attention of a letter to the Editor on or around November 25, titled “ Are there criteria for Dutch Funding etc”. As my name is explicitly mentioned I take the opportunity to offer some clarity and a reaction of facts:
The writer who chose to remain anonymous hid behind the title of a “concerned citizen of St. Maarten” and stated the following:
Quote: “But the following day I was even more surprised that you ( Bibi Shaw) did not champion the people and integrity for the abuse of using Government funds to build a house for these fraudsters” – Unquote.
The facts: to refer to me or any member of my family as fraudsters is out of line and unacceptable. Secondly, the news article specifically mentioned the name of Carlos Dollison, Jr. a nephew of mine whose dwelling was destroyed by Irma. I am advised that he fit the criteria and that repairs to his home had to start prior to hurricane Irma.
Quote: “Glenda Dollison lives in a house on property left to her by her father Carlos Dollison”. The fact: indeed the writer is totally correct that the land was left by my late father Carlos Dollison and I am the sole heir.
Quote: “She ( Glenda Dollison ) lives in a concrete house, so her house was not destroyed as they claim in this ( “Daily Herald”) article”.
Fact: At no time did the press release mention my name as being a recipient of repairs or a new house. There was no claim in the article that the house of Glenda Dollison was destroyed. I suggest that “ the concerned St. Maartener” go and read the article again as Carlos Dollison, Jr. name is mentioned and Lionel & Eneida Dollison.
Quote: “ How does the SMDF justify building, not repairing, a house for this person and they select her and her brother to build a house for”.
Fact: no house was repaired or built for Glenda Dollison. Eneida and Pedro Dollison, Lionel “ Dollison and Carlos Dollison are none heirs to the property “the Concerned St. Maartener” refer to. The last three persons ( Lionel , Eneida and Carlos ) were on the list of SMDF long prior to the hurricanes. Lionel received repairs to his home and a wheelchair ramp, Eneida & Pedro received a new dwelling and Carlos ( my nephew) received a new dwelling. I restate, these persons were on the SMDF list long prior to hurricane Irma.

 The concerned citizen of St. Maarten rightfully and factually stated that Glenda Dollison lives in a house on property left to her by her father. It was the only fact the writer had right.

I trust to have set the record straight.

Glenda Dollison

Bosman and van Raak are feeling the pinch.

Sint Eustatius, January 20th, 2019

Dear editor,

Dutch Parliamentarians Mssrs. Andre Bosman and Ronald van Raak pride themselves on being very experienced and knowledgeable about Kingdom relations, the islands of the former Netherlands Antilles, and “het Statuut”. They always claim to have the best interests of the inhabitants of these islands at heart, and to represent a country (the Netherlands) that has an excellent track record when it comes to the (international) rule of law, good governance, and integrity.

For as long as they have been members of the Dutch Parliament, Mssrs. Bosman and van Raak (together with the successive Dutch Government officials charged with the portfolio of Kingdom Relations) have arrogantly ignored or rejected the consistent and constructive criticism leveled at (the dismal decolonization track record of) the Netherlands. Proposals, decisions, and (constructive) criticism by Government officials of the Dutch Caribbean islands are usually met with derogation and pointing fingers right back at the so-called “corrupt governments” on these islands.

However, since the verdict against the Netherlands in the Corrallo case, the international criticisms towards the Netherlands regarding the Venezuelan refugee issue, the two Court Cases initiated by the legitimate Government of Sint Eustatius thus far, and the strong but justified criticism by Aruba, Curacao, and Sint Maarten towards the Netherlands regarding its mishandling of the “Dispute arrangement” during the last IPKO, Mssrs. Bosman and van Raak have changed their tone.

Attempting to play victims who only have good intentions and “love” for the Dutch Caribbean islands and their populations, they seem to have “suddenly” realized that the dominance (including constant insults, arrogance, and a dismissive “take it or leave it”-attitude) which the Netherlands has been arrogantly and sternly exercising over the Dutch Caribbean governments since 1954, has a flip side to it.
That flip side is having to take moral-, legal-, and financial responsibility, and being exposed and held accountable for one’s actions in a court of (international) law, and the (international) court of public opinion.

Starting in 1954, the Netherlands has been having its cake and eating it too, hiding behind the “autonomy” of the Dutch Caribbean islands when convenient (i.e. in order to prevent negative international exposure and/or taking financial responsibility), and trampling it when expedient.

Now, Mssrs. Bosman and van Raak publicly acknowledge that Holland did not do a good job (with handling Kingdom Relations), that “het Statuut” does not function properly and needs to be adjusted, and that the process of decolonization of the Dutch Caribbean was not completed and should be finalized as soon as possible. They also stated that the people and Governments of the Dutch Caribbean islands should be consulted and allowed to make a choice regarding their constitutional position and the division of rights and obligations between them and the Netherlands.

Mr. Bosman, referring to the article 73 of the UN Charter, has already sent a draft proposal to change “het Statuut” to the Dutch Parliament. According to Mr. Bosman, his proposal is “completely in compliance with international law” and “codifies” constitutional rights obligations in Dutch law. In a recent radio interview, Mr. van Raak even went as far as to suggest a meeting between the Netherlands and the six islands to discuss all issues and come to a solution once and for all.

The question is why Mssrs. Bosman and van Raak, with all their knowledge and experience, are only now acknowledging what research by constitutional scholars like Steven Hillebrink and Fred Soons established years ago based on the UN Charter, UN resolutions, and transcripts of meetings of the UN General Assembly and the Dutch Council of Ministers meetings in the 1950’s.

Said research confirms that the Government of the Netherlands successfully ducked its responsibilities and obligations regarding the full decolonization of its overseas territories when it presented “het Statuut” to the UN General Assembly. Knowing very well that “het Statuut” did not constitute the full decolonization of the Netherlands Antilles, the Government still pushed it through.

Now that the Dutch Government is being internationally condemned, exposed, and criticized, Mssrs. Bosman and van Raak are feeling the pinch, and want to save face. It is exactly this condemnation, exposure, and criticism from within and outside of the Kingdom that the Government of Sint Eustatius has been warning the Government of the Netherlands against.
Had both gentlemen taken note of-, and/or acted on the numerous motions, proposals, and warning letters that the Government of Sint Eustatius sent to the Government of the Netherlands since 2015, they would not have to change their tone and presenting “solutions” now.

In all fairness to my two former Parliamentarian colleagues, they did propose a Commonwealth structure for the Dutch Kingdom in 2013, which would essentially give all the six Dutch Caribbean islands their UN-mandated full measure of self-government.

The Commonwealth proposal was presented a while after a brief discussion I had as Commissioner with Mr. Bosman in The Hague in 2011. During that discussion, we both confirmed that Sint Eustatius has the right to be an autonomous and equal partner in the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and agreed that a plan of action would be made by Sint Eustatius and the Netherlands to outline how that objective would be achieved within five to ten years. Being a liberal politician, Mr. Bosman fully supported Sint Eustatius ambitions.

Then, in June of 2016, former member of the Dutch Senate, and recently appointed President of the Council of State Mr. Thom de Graaf, with the support of many parties in the Senate, presented a motion to “modernize” het Statuut (see The Daily Herald of June 22nd, 2016, pages 1 and 11). In his new position, Mr. de Graaf has the opportunity to overrule the misguided advices of his predecessor Mr. Donner, and play a crucial role making the Government of the Netherlands in compliance with international law. Both Mr. Bosman and Mr. van Raak’s statements clearly justify the legal claims by the legitimate government of Sint Eustatius against the Government of the Netherlands based on the UN Charter. Yet, as representatives of a liberal and social party, they hypocritically voted for the decapitation of the democratically elected Government of Sint Eustatius, and support Mr. Knops’ statement that no elections will be held on Sint Eustatius in the next two months.

With elections coming up in the Netherlands, I hope that Mssrs. Bosman and van Raak’s statements are not just publicity stunts. Mr. Bosman has alledgedly made legislative proposals for that reason in the past according to a fellow-VVD parliamentarian.

Despite my experiences with former Minister Plasterk, I want to give both gentlemen the benefit of the doubt. I want to assume that their statements about bringing “het Statuut” and the relationships within the Kingdom in line with the international obligations of the Netherlands, while respecting the choices of the populations of the six islands, are sincere.

If they are, I suggest that Mssrs. Bosman and van Raak immediately present a motion to start this process to the Dutch Parliament, and initiate preparations for consultations with the legitimate legislatures of the six islands, including that of Sint Eustatius. An act of good faith on the part of the Government of the Netherlands would be to end the unlawful occupation of Sint Eustatius by the appointed puppet Government, and allow the democratically elected, legitimate local Government to resume carrying out its task.

The IPKO scheduled for June of this year would be a good opportunity to have these consultations. Successfully completing these consultations will create a constitutional order within the Kingdom which fully complies with the obligations of the Netherlands as (former) colonizing power.

Sint Eustatius is ready, and the legitimate Government has the mandate of the people. As early as 2017, the Island Council of Sint Eustatius passed legislation paving the way to achieve a full measure of self-government, including a draft constitutional framework. The same Government also commissioned a feasibility study to establish the needs of the island as an autonomous entity in the Kingdom, and the amount of income that is currently being collected locally and transferred to the coffers of the Netherlands.

If Mr. Bosman has a good memory and good intentions, he will remember the discussion we had in 2011 and ensure that his Government cooperates with getting his intentions carried out to benefit of the entire Kingdom.

Clyde I. van Putten Island Council Member and Leader of the Coalition Government of Sint Eustatius

RESPECT WE CARNIVAL CULTURE.

Verse 1 Compose by Baker Jr .
We sick and tired of the SCDF - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE They got we calypso culture in distress - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE Granger got the foundation in hot water - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE Its time to show them calypso power - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE
Granger think his mouth is hot pepper Working behind the seen undercover While he have a business agenda We carnival run by teenagers
Who don’t care if calypso prosper Granger you destroying we culture You can call me baker the troublemaker I rather be that than a teen lover Chorus SCDF time to do your duty - Respect We Carnival Culture Stop using the foundation to make money - Respect We Carnival Culture Instead of dictating the kaiso art form - Respect We Carnival Culture Cause of calypso carnival was born - Respect We Carnival Culture
You disrespecting we culture for spite Moving just like a thief in the night You lucky that you escape jail life Cause of talent teen you have a wife

 

RESPECT WE CARNIVAL CULTURE
Verse 2 Compose by Baker Jr .
Radjuky stop being granger puppet - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE Playing Texas hold’em with the budget - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE Running carnival with this business projection- WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE While the SCDF killing the art form -WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE
Conflict of interest is what I’m smelling Especially working in government By the court of the people you failed screening You both remind me of pinky and the brain
You have no respect for calypso Your dictatorship is now on death row You kill and you bluntly steal couchi show But I would never let you kill calypso Chorus Radjuky and Granger you both got to go - Respect We Calypso Culture Stop playing politics with we show - Respect We Carnival Culture Since you both like to go Easter hunting - Respect We Carnival Culture Wear Easter bunny costume jouvert morning - Respect We Carnival Culture
It’s time to respect the calypsonians Or you will get a 50th present Your dirty laundry will be the talk of town So by sun down I need you both gone

 

RESPECT WE CARNIVAL CULTURE
Verse 3 Compose by Baker Jr .
Alston you a next puppet the string - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE Got Granger playing with your intelligence - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE Most SCDF members isn’t able - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE Watching Micky cutting deals under the table -WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE
Jouvert and calypso belongs together But SCDF have an agenda They say they not making money from calypso So they leaving Nagico dictate we show
If you got to do all that for a sponsor Give the show to who care for we culture You say seven member out of nine hate calypso Those opportunist board member must go Chorus That unethical move you did to kaiso - Respect We Carnival Culture Sabotaging we calypso show - Respect We Carnival Culture You already destroy the junior calypso - Respect We Carnival Culture You try to take Anna Queen show just like couchy show - Respect We Carnival Culture
You sabotage good locals promoters You now even turn on the boot holders Time to expose your hidden agenda Selling carnival to the highest bidder Granger!
RESPECT WE CARNIVAL CULTURE
Verse 4 Compose by Baker Jr .
Granger feel he’s indispensible - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE With lying Alston his biggest moumou - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE But I hope SCDF could handle - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE When I reveal all the deals under the table - WE AIN’T TOLERATING NO MORE
You all got too much business going on Micky on a money making spree Disregard and disrespect the down trodden Sell out the village to Abougazy
Nothing but alcohol is now gone You getting incentive from business men They should audit you for that hundred thousand The rent money collecting from the boots and them Chorus Abougazy even got club in we village - Respect We Carnival Culture SCDF is on a money rampage - Respect We Carnival Culture We need to sign a petition and send a clear message - Respect We Carnival Culture The SCDF boys club need to be replace - Respect We Carnival Culture
Micky got business in every vicinity He making sure set up his family Alston and the SCDF teens and Radjouky We want back we carnival how it used to be.

 

WE WANT TO KNOW Verse 1 His Majesty Baker Jr.
THIS ONE GOING GO VIRAL ON FB
CAUSE THESE CALYPSO VITAL QUESTIONS ARE TRICKY
FOR THE ST MAARTEN CARNIVAL COMMITTEE
TO GIVE ACCOUNT FOR ALL THAT SPONSOR MONEY
NOW LETS GET TO THE QUESTIONS IMMEDIATELY
AND THE FIRST QUESTION IS FOR MICKEY
THE 1.2 MILLION YOU GET FROM ILTT
WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT HAPPEN TO ALL THAT MONEY?
Chorus-
DID YOU PAY OFF THE CARNIVAL DEBT WITH A LUMPSUM? OR DID YOU USED SOME TO GO ON BIG VACATION?
DO YOU REMEMBER THE LAST JUNIOR TALENT TEEN PAGEANT? DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT HAPPEN WHEN YOU WAS PRESIDENT DID YOU PLAYED SICK TO ESCAPE INCARCERATION
HOW MUCH FUNDS YOU GIVE TO YOUR TALENT TEEN PARENTS THAT IS THE SAME YEAR YOU HAD TO STEP DOWN WHY YOU ARE STILL AROUND AND WHERE ALL THAT MONEY GONE?
WE WANT TO KNOW Verse 2 His Majesty Baker Jr.
THESE OTHER QUESTIONS IS FOR ALSTON
ARE YOU REALLY THE PRESIDENT OR GRANGER AGENT?
BUT SINCE YOU FRONTING AND LIKE TO TALK DI THING
THEN CAN YOU TELL US WHERE THE 1.2 MILLION WENT?
DO YOU KNOW ABOUT TRUJILLO OFF SHORE ACCOUNT
BALAGUER HOW MUCH YOU GETTING PAY TO BE IN FRONT?
IS YOUR NEW VICE PRESIDENT A KITITIAN?
IS SHE CALLING MORE SHOTS THAN YOU ALSTON?
Chorus-
IS MIKEY REALLY TAKING THE QUEEN PAGEANT TO GIVE TO THE BIG BOTTOM KITTIAN?
TELL US WHY MALCOM LEFT THE FOUNDATION? AND IS IT TRUE RADJOUKY ALSO GONE WHY THE SOCALLED APPOINTED DIRECTOR
GRANGER THE LONE RANGER CAN BE TREASURER?
IS THE MONEY TO SWEET THAT’S WHY HE CAN’T LEAVE?
AND WHY YOU HAVE A RAT MINDING THE CHEESE?

WE WANT TO KNOW Verse 3 His Majesty Baker Jr.
ALSTON BALAGUER YOU HAVE LESS BAGGAGE BUT AS MIKE ACCOMPLICE YOU LOSE LEVERAGE WHY YOU THINK YOU ALL SMARTER AND MORE CERFISTICATED? BUT USED THE MOMMY SYMPATHY CARD FOR GOOD IMAGE DON’T YOU KNOW CALYPSO WILL DESTROY YOUR FATE WHY MOMMY AIN’T TEACH ALL YO NOT TO MESS WITH HIGH VOLTAGE? ALL YO TIME EXPIRE TO LEAVE WITH NO REGRETS BUT THERE IS NO EXPERATION DATE ON DISRESPECT
Chorus-
WHY IS CALYPSO YOU CHOSE TO NEGLECT? FOR THE ART FORM AND CULTURE YOU GOT NO RESPECT WHY SHOWS YOU COULD BENEFIT FROM YOU WANT TO TAKE? WHY YOU ENVY ALL THE PROMOTERS THAT YOU REPLACE YOU TRY THE SAME THING WITH POSH PROMOTIONS BUT YOU FAILED ANNA STOOD UP TO YOU TAKE YOU COURTS AND WIN THE CASE TROJILLO IS IT CAUSE THE SHOW’S A BIG SUCCESS? YOU TRY TO GIVE IT TO YOUR MISTRESS
WE WANT TO KNOW Verse 4 His Majesty Baker Jr.
BEFORE THIS SONG DONE A FEW MORE QUESTIONS HOPE THESE LAST QUESTIONS DON’T TRIGGER YOUR EMOTIONS LYRICAL QUESTIONS OF MAS DESTRUCTION
AND IF YOU GUILTY YOU’LL BE STRIP FROM YOUR POSSITION WHY YOU TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE DOWN TRODDEN? IS IT TO EMBEZZLE FUNDS THROUGH THE FOUNDATION? IS THE ENTIRE BOARD GETTING SOME KIND OF PENSSION? OR BALAGUED AND TROJILLO GETTING A LUMPSUM?
Chorus-
SCDF HERE IS A SIMPLE QUESTION HOW MUCH FUNDS YOU DONATING TO YOUR OFFSHOW ACCOUNT?
IS IT THROUGH WIFEY NOW HOSTING COUCHY SHOW ? IS THIS HOW YOU TRANFERING THE FUNDS OFF SHURE AND IS IT TRUE WHAT SCHOOL CHRIDREN SAY MIKEY?
ARE YOU THERE WITH THE KITTITIAN VP? IT NOT MY BUSINESS IF YOU HORNING WIFEY MY BUSINESS TO KEEP KAISO ALIVE IN MY COUNTRY

More Articles ...


Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x

RADIO FROM VOICEOFTHECARIBBEAN.NET

Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x