Dear Editor,

For many citizens, it was a day that reinforced the belief that the coalition's interests were placed above those of the country and its people. At a time when leadership, accountability, and service to the public should be the guiding principles of government, political considerations appeared to take precedence over what was best for Sint Maarten.

Amid these developments, Minister of VSA, Richinel Brug, remained focused on the responsibilities entrusted to him by the people. Throughout his tenure, he demonstrated a commitment to carrying out his duties with diligence, integrity, and genuine concern for the community's well-being. His efforts reflected an understanding that public office is a responsibility to serve the people, not political interests.

Regardless of differing political views, many recognized Minister Brug's dedication to addressing the population's needs and working toward meaningful solutions to the challenges facing Sint Maarten. His actions underscored the importance of putting the country first and ensuring that the people's interests remain at the center of decision-making.

As history records the events of May 29, 2026, it will also record those who chose to stand firm in their commitment to public service. The people of Sint Maarten deserve leadership that prioritizes the nation above political alliances, personal agendas, and coalition dynamics.

The lesson from this day is clear: governments come and go, coalitions rise and fall, but the responsibility to serve the people of Sint Maarten must always remain paramount. Country above coalition. People above politics.

Marcus Pantophlet

Dear Editor,
Like many in the community, I was saddened to see the destruction of the beautiful sea grape tree on Halley Drive in Simpson Bay. As I watched members of the Simpson Bay community protest during a Facebook Live broadcast, I listened to residents speak with frustration and heartbreak about what was taking place. One resident stated, “Simpson Bay was not supposed to be Miami.” Another stood beside the damaged tree and said, “Look at our roots. They’re digging us out of the system.” Those words captured exactly what many residents have been feeling for years as Simpson Bay continues losing pieces of its identity through unchecked overdevelopment and the steady disappearance of natural spaces.
In 2022, I met with members of the Simpson Bay community and discussed the importance of ensuring that this tree remained intact. The sea grape tree carried cultural significance, ecological importance, and deep value to the surrounding community. For many residents, it formed part of the identity and landscape of Simpson Bay and remained one of the few natural landmarks left within an increasingly developed area. Children climbed the tree, played beneath it, and gathered around it in ways that have become increasingly uncommon during a period where screens and indoor living dominate daily life. Mature trees contribute far beyond aesthetics. They provide shade, support biodiversity, reduce temperatures, stabilize soils, assist with stormwater absorption, and maintain continuity within rapidly changing neighborhoods.
Residents protesting on site stated that commitments had been made that the tree would not be touched. Days later, the public was informed that the damage was “accidental.” Based on the footage and the visible excavation around the root system, I do not believe there was anything accidental about it.
What has taken place on Halley Drive reflects a broader issue that extends far beyond a single tree. Simpson Bay has increasingly become an example of how aggressive development, when not balanced properly with community interests and environmental considerations, can gradually erode the character of an area. Residents continue raising concerns, attending meetings, submitting objections, and asking for greater consideration of the long-term impacts these projects have on their community, only to watch developments continue moving forward.
The gradual loss of green spaces, mature trees, drainage areas, and community character in Simpson Bay should serve as a warning for the rest of St. Maarten. Once these environmental and social buffers disappear, they are extremely difficult to restore. Communities become hotter, more flood-prone, more congested, and less resilient during storms and heavy rainfall events.
The existing Tree Policy already recognizes the importance of mature and historic trees because of their environmental, cultural, landscape, and historical value. Historic tree assessments conducted on St. Maarten identified hundreds of significant trees throughout the island, including concentrations within Simpson Bay. Sea grape trees themselves were identified among the most common Class I historic tree species documented during these assessments.
Removing mature trees from coastal communities weakens resilience at a time when St. Maarten should be strengthening it. Sea grape trees help reduce erosion, stabilize shorelines, provide habitat for wildlife, reduce heat buildup, and act as natural wind barriers during storms. In a country still recovering from Hurricane Irma while facing worsening climate threats, the destruction of mature trees reflects extremely short-sighted development practices.
This situation reinforces the need for stronger environmental legislation and clearer development safeguards. Policies such as the Tree Policy, Hillside Policy, and Beach Policy should eventually be supported through enforceable legislation, including proper Environmental Impact Assessment requirements for major developments. Developers should be required to demonstrate how projects will avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental and community impacts before approvals are granted.
Residents should not have to stand in the street protesting to protect one of the few remaining mature trees within their community.
The sea grape tree on Halley Drive represented part of the environmental and social fabric of Simpson Bay. Its destruction should encourage a broader national discussion about what kind of development St. Maarten wants moving forward and whether communities are truly being included in that vision.
If Simpson Bay continues down this path unchecked, it risks losing the very identity that made people want to live there in the first place. That should concern all of St. Maarten.
Tadzio Bervoets
Belair
Sint Maarten

Dear Editor,
The garbage situation on Sint Maarten has been a serious concern for some time, and in recent weeks it has become harder to ignore. Piles have been building up in Cole Bay and other neighborhoods, contractual disputes between government and the local waste haulers have moved into public view, and the landfill itself has been described in recent reporting as being in a precarious state.
I want to read this alongside another story currently in the international news, because the two echo. Over the past few days, media and health authorities have been covering a cluster of Andes hantavirus cases connected to the MV Hondius, a Dutch-flagged cruise vessel, with several passenger fatalities following travel in South America. Investigators in Argentina now believe the outbreak began with a 70-year-old Dutch ornithologist and his wife who visited a rat-infested landfill just outside Ushuaia, in the days before boarding the ship. The landfill is a known birding site, since rare Patagonian species are drawn to the waste, which is what brought the couple there. Authorities suspect they inhaled aerosolized particles from the urine and droppings of rats carrying the Andes strain of hantavirus. The husband died on the ship; his wife died two weeks later.
This particular outbreak started at a pile of garbage that produced enough rats to sustain a viral reservoir, in a place ordinary visitors walked into. That is the part Sint Maarten should be reading carefully. Hantavirus is the headline, and I am being careful with the word, but closer to home leptospirosis is also worth mentioning, since it spreads through water and soil contaminated by rodent urine and shows up in the Caribbean regularly. There is no outbreak here, and I am not insinuating there is, but the conditions that allow these diseases to circulate are present on this island.
For a country that sits within the Kingdom of the Netherlands and ranks among the busiest cruise destinations in the Caribbean, this is worth thinking about. Thousands of visitors move every week through ports and an airport that empty into the same streets, drains, and shorelines residents live with year-round. None of this is meant as criticism of the cruise sector, which remains a central pillar of our economy, supporting employment, businesses, government revenue, and thousands of livelihoods. The argument is simpler: a destination that depends this heavily on tourism needs strong environmental and sanitation standards, because that is how an industry like this is protected over time. When large numbers of people move through concentrated urban and coastal spaces, the basics matter — regular waste collection, clean public areas, working drainage, healthy ecosystems — and they are part of what visitors are actually paying for.
The current crisis is also a chance to stop treating waste management as a standalone sanitation issue and start treating it as part of a wider conversation about sustainability and resilience. Better waste systems give us environmental protection, climate adaptation, public health preparedness, tourism stability, and stronger communities at the same time. We already know what happens when our environmental vulnerabilities meet our economic and infrastructure pressures, because Irma made that lesson clear, and climate change continues to add pressure in ways that make integrated environmental management a present-day requirement. Clean-up campaigns and reactive sweeps after public frustration have never carried this conversation forward. The actual path runs through long-term planning, real investment in infrastructure, stronger enforcement against illegal dumping, public awareness, and the modernization of waste systems we have been discussing for years.
Sint Maarten's environmental and economic futures rest on the same foundations. The garbage problem deserves a steady, serious response, well past any single news cycle, because environmental management is one of the basic things a country like ours has to get right. A landfill at the end of the world has just made the case for taking ours, and our garbage situation in general, much more seriously.
Tadzio Bervoets
Belair
St. Maarten

Honorable Minister, Good evening,

It is with great shock and disappointment that the St. Maarten Carnival Development Foundation (SCDF) has taken note of the unilateral decision to close a section of Pondfill in front of the booths along that stretch, thereby creating what amounts to a second Carnival Village.

This decision is unfair to the stakeholders inside Carnival Village, as it cuts off direct access to the Village during the peak of the Carnival season. Our booth holders are livid, and the SCDF cannot allow this decision to go unchallenged.

The government’s original policy of allowing only 24 booths was already increased to 41, creating a chaotic, uncontrolled environment that government controllers and KPSM are now unable to manage properly. The booths remain open longer than they should, seating is now being allowed along the roadside, which was not permitted before, and the result is a mass gathering of people on a main road.

This is not a situation created by the SCDF. It was created by the government, and the SCDF and its stakeholders are now suffering the consequences.

Our booth holders inside Carnival Village are subjected almost daily to health, fire, economic, and, most recently, tax inspections. At the same time, they have seen their sales dwindle due to developments outside the Village.

We understand safety, but what is being created now is a new gathering area outside the Village, in public, with no security, no weapon scanning, no controls.

As such, we are requesting an immediate and urgent meeting. We are also requesting that the Minister reverse this decision and that the overall situation involving the booths on Pondfill, which the SCDF has warned about since a similar attempt was made two years ago, be discussed in its proper context with the SCDF, not around us.

We look forward to your swift response.

On behalf of the board of the SCDF,

Edwardo Radjouki
President
St. Maarten Carnival Development Foundation
imageimage
Illidge Road 60-E
St. Maarten - Dutch Caribbean

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Web: www.sxm-carnival.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/sxmcarnival
Instagram: sxmcarnival