St. Peters Community demands answers in fatal police shooting of Rudy Benjamin.

~Seven Months later, Maurice Lake questions camera evidence, autopsy findings and police use of force~

mauricelake13092026PHILIPSBURG:--- Seven months after Rudy Benjamin was fatally shot during a police-involved incident in St. Peters, Maurice Lake, co-founder of the St. Peters Community Council, is demanding clear answers for Benjamin’s family and the wider community.

In a letter submitted to the editor, Lake said anger, suspicion, rumors, grief and unanswered questions continue to hang over St. Peters and the entire island of St. Maarten following the fatal shooting on February 13, 2026.

Lake warned that the prolonged absence of a public update is undermining the trust that community leaders spent years building between residents and the Police Force of Sint Maarten.

“The family and the people have the right to know the facts of what went wrong that fatal night,” Lake stated.

Questions about Camera Evidence

According to Lake, the last publicly available information indicated that the investigation into the police-involved shooting would be handled by the Prosecutor’s Office in Curaçao.

However, he said the community has not received any subsequent update regarding the status of the investigation, available camera evidence or the results of the autopsy.

Lake is particularly concerned about whether public surveillance cameras captured the incident.

He said a camera was installed on a public light pole along St. Peter's Main Road near the location where the shooting occurred. The community therefore wants to know whether the camera was operational, whether footage was secured, and whether investigators have examined it.

No conclusion can be drawn about what the footage may show unless the investigating authorities officially release or describe it. Nevertheless, Lake maintains that authorities must address the existence and status of any recording in the interest of transparency.

“The family and the community of St. Peters need to know the truth and see the public camera evidence,” Lake said.

Was Deadly Force Necessary?

Lake is also calling for investigators to determine whether the officers involved followed required procedures governing the use of force and made every reasonable effort to de-escalate the situation.

He questioned whether Benjamin presented an immediate threat and why a community police officer or other officers familiar with St. Peters were not called to help bring the situation under control.

“I truly don’t understand why the community police officer or other officers who know the community wasn’t called to de-escalate the situation instead of using deadly force,” Lake stated.

He also wants to know what happened immediately after Benjamin was shot, including whether officers attempted to administer CPR or other lifesaving assistance.

Lake pointed out that KPSM has invested in training and professional development for its personnel, including specialized instruction in lifesaving, emergency response, and community engagement.

“Did the officers apply any of that lifesaving or CPR training that fatal night?” he asked.

These questions do not determine the outcome of the investigation or establish that the officers acted unlawfully. They are, however, among the issues Lake believes must be answered to restore public confidence.

Years of Community Trust at Risk

Lake said founding members of the St. Peters Community Council spent years building cooperation and trust between residents and the police.

That relationship, he warned, is now under pressure because the community has received little information about the circumstances surrounding Benjamin’s death.

Community policing depends heavily on cooperation between residents and law-enforcement officers. That cooperation becomes more difficult when residents believe serious questions are being ignored or information is being withheld.

Lake said this was the first incident of its kind involving a St. Peters resident who, according to him, was not considered a threat to the community or society.

Benjamin was described as well-known and well-liked throughout St. Peters and the wider St. Martin community.

Family Has a Right to the Facts

Lake emphasized that Benjamin’s family should not be left indefinitely without answers about the circumstances in which their loved one died.

He is calling for the investigation to be completed without unnecessary delay and for its findings to be communicated transparently to Benjamin’s family and the public.

He also said accountability must follow if investigators determine that mistakes were made or that established procedures were not followed.

“The family and the people have the right to know the facts,” Lake reiterated.

The request for transparency does not mean investigators should disclose information that could compromise the case's integrity. However, seven months after the shooting, Lake believes the responsible authorities should at least provide the family and community with a meaningful update on the investigation’s status.

That update should address whether camera footage exists, whether it was secured, whether the autopsy has been completed and when the final investigative findings are expected.

Call for Prayer and Transparency

Despite the anger and unanswered questions, Lake urged the community to continue praying for Benjamin’s family, the police officers involved and a fair and transparent investigation.

“Let’s continue to pray to God for the family, the police and a transparent investigation by showing the public the camera evidence based on integrity,” he stated.

Lake said the St. Peters community is looking forward to the investigation being concluded as soon as possible.

Seven months after the fatal shooting, the central demand from St. Peters remains unchanged: the community wants the facts.

Residents want to know what the evidence shows, whether the use of deadly force was justified, whether lifesaving assistance was provided and when the independent investigation will finally be concluded.

Until those questions are answered, the cloud of suspicion, anger and grief surrounding the death of Rudy Benjamin will continue to hang over St. Peters and the wider St. Martin community.


Parliament spent an estimated Cg. 870,000 on MP travel as meetings and legislative action plunged.

~Annual Report celebrates overseas delegations but provides no breakdown of airfare, hotels or Per Diem~

parliamenttravel1092026PHILIPSBURG:---  Parliament of Sint Maarten spent an estimated Cg. 870,143 on travel for Members of Parliament during budget year 2025, while its latest Annual Report documents substantial declines in meetings, committee activity, motions and legislation passed.

The contrast is staggering.

Parliament’s actual expenditure for 2025 amounted to Cg. 13,304,941. According to its financial overview, MPs spent 6.54% of that amount on travel expenses.

Applying Parliament’s reported percentage to its actual expenditure produces an estimated travel bill of approximately Cg. 870,143.

But while the report celebrates Parliament’s participation in Parlatino, ParlAmericas, IPKO, Tripartite consultations and other overseas engagements, it does not provide the public with a single detailed breakdown showing how much was spent on airline tickets, hotels, daily allowances, transportation or individual delegations.

The public is told where MPs traveled and who attended—but not what taxpayers paid.

Travel spending without the receipts

The Annual Report does not disclose:

  • The exact amount spent on parliamentary travel;
  • The cost of Parlatino delegations;
  • Airfare paid for individual MPs;
  • Hotel and accommodation expenses;
  • Per diem rates or total allowances paid;
  • Ground transportation and hospitality costs;
  • Travel expenses for accompanying Secretariat personnel;
  • Costs paid by host organizations;
  • Reimbursements received by Parliament; or
  • Unused travel advances returned.

The Cg. 870,143 figure is itself an estimate because Parliament published only the percentage devoted to MPs’ travel, not the exact amount.

That lack of detail is especially troubling for an institution whose constitutional responsibility includes scrutinizing government spending and demanding transparency from ministers.

Parliament cannot credibly demand financial accountability from government while providing the public with only a percentage to describe its own travel bill.

Performance fell across every meeting category

While travel consumed an estimated Cg. 870,000 in 2025, Parliament’s performance figures for the 2025–2026 Parliamentary Year show declining institutional activity.

Parliament recorded 93 meetings across its five main categories, down from 124 in the previous parliamentary year.

That represents 31 fewer meetings and a 25% decline.

Committee activity fell the most, from 65 meetings in 2024–2025 to 42 in 2025–2026—a decline of about 35.4%.

Public Meetings declined from 23 to 21. Central Committee meetings fell from 25 to 23. Presidium meetings dropped from eight to five, while Faction Leaders meetings decreased from three to two.

Every meeting category declined.

Motions Collapsed Nearly 79%

The deterioration was even more severe in Parliament’s use of motions—one of the strongest formal instruments MPs possess to demand government action.

MPs submitted 28 motions during 2024–2025. During 2025–2026, they submitted only six.

That represents a collapse of approximately 78.6%.

The number of motions passed fell from 21 to three—a reduction of approximately 85.7%.

Parliament’s report lists six motions as submitted but provides voting records for only five. One motion, concerning the CZAR Management matter, is listed without a recorded outcome explaining whether it was withdrawn, postponed, left pending or never brought to a vote.

MPs traveled, attended conferences and participated in regional assemblies, yet collectively placed only six motions before Parliament during the reporting period.

Only One Ordinance Recorded as Passed

Parliament also recorded seven draft national ordinances submitted during 2025–2026 but only one ordinance passed.

The sole ordinance recorded as passed—the Basic Payment Account Ordinance—was not one of the seven newly submitted measures. It was legislation carried over from an earlier parliamentary year.

In the previous parliamentary year, Parliament recorded five draft national ordinances passed. That number fell to one in 2025–2026—an 80% decline.

Several important financial-sector laws entered the parliamentary pipeline, including legislation dealing with payment service providers, virtual assets, clearing systems and financial-market infrastructure.

However, none of those seven newly submitted ordinances is listed as having been passed during the same reporting period.

Large Delegation Sent to Panama

The Annual Report identifies a major Parlatino delegation that traveled to Panama City for the organization’s 39th General Assembly from March 24 to 26, 2026.

The delegation consisted of nine MPs:

  • Parliament Chair Sarah Wescot-Williams;
  • Francisco Lacroes;
  • Veronica Jansen-Webster;
  • Christopher Wever;
  • Egbert Doran;
  • Lyndon Lewis;
  • Viren Kotai;
  • Darryl York; and
  • Dimar Labega.

Secretary General G.J. Richardson also accompanied the delegation, bringing the reported group to ten people.

The report provides extensive details about the committees and meetings attended in Panama. It does not disclose what the trip cost.

A second Parlatino delegation, consisting of MPs Christopher Wever and Francisco Lacroes, traveled to Curaçao in May 2026 for the inaugural meeting of Parlatino’s Caribbean Special Commission.

Once again, no price tag was provided.

Because the financial overview covers calendar year 2025, the estimated Cg. 870,143 travel expenditure cannot automatically be said to include the Panama and Curaçao trips undertaken in 2026. Those delegations would generally fall under the 2026 budget unless any expenses were prepaid.

That means the actual travel cost connected to all activities documented in the 2025–2026 Annual Report may be higher than the figure disclosed for 2025 alone.

Written Questions Increased

The annual report does record one significant improvement: written-question letters increased from 77 in 2024–2025 to 114 in 2025–2026.

That increase should be acknowledged.

However, written questions are only one component of parliamentary oversight. Questions do not replace meetings, committee investigations, motions, amendments, or legislation.

A Parliament that writes more letters but holds fewer meetings, convenes fewer committees, submits dramatically fewer motions, and passes only one ordinance cannot rely on written questions alone as proof of strong institutional performance.

Taxpayers Deserve the Full Cost

International and regional parliamentary participation can provide value. MPs may obtain information, build relationships, represent Sint Maarten and participate in discussions affecting the country.

But public value cannot be assumed merely because a delegation traveled.

Parliament must demonstrate what each trip cost, why each participant was selected, what was achieved, and how the travel benefited the people paying the bill.

For every delegation, Parliament should publish:

  • The names of all travelers;
  • The purpose and duration of the trip;
  • Airfare and ticket-change costs;
  • Hotel expenses;
  • Per diem paid to each traveler;
  • Transportation and registration costs;
  • Contributions from host organizations; and
  • A report detailing the outcomes and benefits to Sint Maarten.

Without that information, taxpayers are left with photographs, ceremony descriptions and lists of attendees—but no meaningful way to determine whether nearly Cg. 870,000 in annual MP travel expenditure delivered value.

Accountability must begin at Parliament

Members of Parliament are full-time elected representatives. Their primary responsibilities are to legislate, scrutinize government, approve the national budget and represent the people.

Travel may support that work, but it cannot replace it.

The official record now shows:

  • An estimated Cg. 870,143 spent on MPs’ travel in 2025;
  • A 25% decline in overall meeting activity;
  • A 35.4% decline in committee meetings;
  • A 78.6% collapse in motions submitted;
  • An 85.7% decline in motions passed; and
  • Only one draft national ordinance recorded as passed.

Those figures demand more than a glossy annual report.

They demand receipts, a complete travel ledger and a public explanation of how Parliament can justify substantial travel spending while several of its most important indicators of legislative and oversight activity moved sharply downward.

Parliament demands accountability from every ministry and government-owned company. Taxpayers have every right to demand the same from Parliament.

If MPs can tell the public where they traveled, they must also tell the public what it cost—and what Sint Maarten received in return.

MP Lewis Raises alarm over robberies targeting residents and tourists, calls for urgent action

lyndonlewis09092026PHILIPSBURG:--- Nation Opportunity Wealth (NOW), Member of Parliament (MP) and Vice Chair of Parliament's Justice Committee, Lyndon Lewis, has expressed serious concern over the influx of reports regarding robberies that occurred over the weekend, particularly incidents involving tourists and residents having their jewelry snatched.

According to reports received by MP Lewis, several complaints were made over the weekend involving individuals, reportedly operating on scooters, targeting people and snatching jewelry in and around the Simpson Bay area.

MP Lewis stated that this developing trend requires the utmost attention from the Government, the Ministry of Justice, law enforcement authorities, and the Prosecutor's Office before the situation escalates and results in serious injury or tragedy.

"Sint Maarten has long and proudly been known as the Friendly Island. We cannot allow criminal activity to create an atmosphere of fear among our residents or the visitors who choose our country as their vacation destination,"  MP Lewis stated.

MP Lewis also issued a stern message to those involved in these criminal activities, emphasizing that individuals who choose to commit crimes must understand that their actions have consequences.

"To those who believe that they can continue committing these crimes without consequences, think again. When apprehended, I expect the appropriate authorities to ensure that offenders are dealt with in accordance with the full extent of the law. A perceived lack of detention capacity must never become an invitation for criminal behavior," MP Lewis said.

As Vice Chair of the Justice Committee, MP Lewis is calling on the Government, particularly the Prime Minister and Minister of Justice, to treat the matter as an urgent public-safety concern and establish a coordinated plan of action aimed at suppressing this developing trend.

MP Lewis further stressed that strengthening public safety requires adequate investment in the justice chain. With preparations for the 2027 national budget, he cautioned against reducing or reallocating funding that is necessary for the Ministry of Justice to properly execute its responsibilities.

"We cannot continuously demand more from our law enforcement officers while providing them with fewer resources. If we are serious about combating crime, protecting our residents, safeguarding our tourism product, and maintaining confidence in Sint Maarten as a safe destination, then the necessary financial and operational resources must be made available," MP Lewis stated.

MP Lewis also acknowledged the continued efforts of all law enforcement personnel, who continue to carry out their responsibilities despite challenges involving staffing and available resources.

"I recognize that our men and women in blue are doing what they can with the resources available to them. I want to acknowledge each and every officer who continues to show up, patrol our communities, respond to incidents, and enforce the law. I was one of you and your work does not go unnoticed." MP Lewis stated.

MP Lewis concluded by stressing that public safety must remain a national priority and that addressing this issue requires immediate enforcement measures as well as a sustainable strategy that provides law enforcement with the manpower, equipment, resources, and legislative support necessary to effectively combat crime.

"Our residents deserve to feel safe in their communities, and our visitors deserve to enjoy Sint Maarten without fear of becoming victims of crime. Protecting both is essential not only to our quality of life, but also to the reputation and economic stability of our country. We must act before this trend becomes an even greater problem." MP Lewis concluded. 

Two Men Arrested After Firearm Found During Early-Morning Police Control.

firearm14092026PHILIPSBURG:--- In the early morning hours of Monday, September 14, 2026, shortly after 1:00 a.m., police officers conducting controls on Zagers-Gut Road intercepted a white Kia Seltos previously identified in a video circulating on social media.

The video showed a group of men displaying several firearms on Sint Maarten. During the police control, officers recognized the vehicle and stopped it near the intersection of Zagers-Gut Road and Coralita Road.

When officers stopped the vehicle, the driver exited while carrying a firearm. Officers immediately instructed him to place the weapon on the ground, which he did. Police subsequently secured the firearm.

Police immediately arrested the driver, identified by the initials J.J.B., who is known to the police. Police also took the passenger, identified by the initials C.E.D., into custody.

Both men were transported to the police station in Philipsburg, where they remain detained for questioning in connection with the firearm possession. The investigation into the circumstances surrounding the firearm and the video is ongoing.

KPSM continues to take a firm approach toward the illegal possession and carrying of firearms. Targeted police controls and investigative actions will continue as part of the Police Force's efforts to remove illegal firearms from our streets and enhance the safety of the Sint Maarten community.

KPSM encourages members of the public with information about illegal firearms or related criminal activity to report it to the police.

Three minors arrested in connection with Festival Village Break-Ins.

festivalvillagebreakin13092026PHILIPSBURG:--- The Police Force of Sint Maarten (KPSM) is providing an update on the investigation into break-ins at several booths in the Festival Village on Suoaliga Road in the early morning hours of Sunday, September 13, 2026.

Following the incident, video footage of the break-in began circulating on social media. After seeing the footage, a parent brought her son to the police station on Sunday, September 13, 2026, as she recognized him as being one of the suspects involved in the incident. The minor was subsequently arrested.

On Monday, September 14, 2026, two additional parents brought their sons to the police station after recognizing their involvement in the break-in. Both minors were arrested and are currently being held at the police station pending further investigation.

All three arrested suspects are minors. KPSM will therefore not disclose any information that could identify them.

The investigation remains ongoing, and KPSM is still actively working to identify and locate a fourth suspect believed to be involved in the break-in.

KPSM commends the parents who came forward and cooperated with the police investigation. Their actions show the important role the community can play in helping law enforcement address criminal activity.

Anyone with information that may assist the investigation is urged to contact KPSM at 542-2222 or anonymously through the 9300 tip line.

 

 


Subcategories